Abstract
Background/purpose: This study investigated in seven patients the main causes of accidental fractures of various implant components. Materials and methods: We used a scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope to observe the fracture interfaces of four fixtures, six abutment screws, and nine gold screws retrieved from patients with prosthetic problems. Results: In all fixtures and some abutment screws, parafunctional force and a cantilever design ultimately resulted in movement of low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) at most fracture surfaces. Fractographic observations showed that overloading deformed the grain sizes, and the no precipitates were present on the high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) or matrices of some abutment screws and most gold screws. Conclusion: To avoid implant fracture, certain underlying mechanical risk factors should be noted such as patients with a habit of bruxism, bridgework with a cantilever design, or two implants installed in a line in the posterior mandible.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 8-14 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Dental Sciences |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 03 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- HAGB
- LAGB
- dental implant
- fatigue fracture
- fractography