From Pigments to Pixels: A Comparison of Human and AI Painting

Yikang Sun, Cheng Hsiang Yang, Yanru Lyu, Rungtai Lin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

From entertainment to medicine and engineering, artificial intelligence (AI) is now being used in a wide range of fields, yet the extent to which AI can be effectively applied to the creative arts remains to be seen. In this research, a neural algorithm of artistic style was used to generate six AI paintings and these were compared with six paintings on the same theme by an amateur painter. Two sets of paintings were compared by 380 participants, 70 percent of whom had previous painting experience. Results indicate that color and line are the key elements of aesthetic appreciation. Additionally, the style transfer had a marked effect on the viewer when there was a close correspondence between the painting and the style transfer but not when there was little correspondence, indicating that AI is of limited effectiveness in modifying an existing style. Although the use of neural networks simulating human learning has come a long way in narrowing the gap between paintings produced by AI and those produced in the traditional fashion, there remains a fundamental difference in terms of aesthetic appreciation since paintings generated by AI are based on technology, while those produced by humans are based on emotion.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3724
JournalApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 04 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • cognition and communication
  • human artist
  • painting creation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From Pigments to Pixels: A Comparison of Human and AI Painting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this