Functional Outcomes Are Similar After Arthroscopic Capsular Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears Between Outside-In Technique and All-Inside Technique Using Pre-Tied Suture Device

Purpose: To compare outcomes of arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex capsular repair at 2-year follow-up between outside-in and all-inside techniques. Methods: In total, 58 consecutive patients (wrists) with a Palmer 1B triangular fibrocartilage complex tear without symptomatic distal radioulnar joint instability underwent arthroscopic suture repair from 2011 to 2019 including 31 patients via the outside-in technique (group A) and 27 via the all-inside technique using a pre-tied needle device (group B). Two-year follow-up included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, motion range, grip strength, Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and complication rate. Correlation between functional result and patient satisfaction was analyzed. Results: Score changes in VAS, wrist flexion–tension, supination–pronation, grip strength, MMWS, and QuickDASH at 2-year follow-up were not significantly different between group A (3.4 ± 0.8, 18.4 ± 17.5, 12.9 ± 13.3, 30.7 ± 11.2, 26.6 ± 7.9 and 19.4 ± 9.9 and group B (3.4 ± 1.0, 18.5 ± 18.3, 15.6 ± 13.7, 30.8 ± 11.4, 28.1 ± 8.6, and 7.6 ± 7.2) with P values of .400, 489, 223, 486, 240, and .223 respectively. Surgical time averaged 105 minutes (78 to 136) in group A and 94 minutes (61-126) in group B with significant difference (P = .012). Patient satisfaction averaged 1.1 (0-3.5) in group A and 1.0 (range 0-3.0) in group B. Satisfaction score was more strongly correlated with QuickDASH (coefficients: 0.863 in group A and 0.918 in group B) than with MMWS (–0.693 in group A and –0.465), grip strength (–0.619 in group A and –0.417 in group B) and VAS score (0.607 in group A and 0.222 in group B). Conclusions: Both techniques achieved comparable outcomes with shorter surgical time in all-inside repair using pre-tied needle device. Patient satisfaction was strongly correlated with QuickDASH score. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative investigation.