Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gefitinib plus cisplatin and radiotherapy in previously untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

  • Vincent Gregoire*
  • , Marc Hamoir
  • , Changhu Chen
  • , Madeleine Kane
  • , Andrzej Kawecki
  • , Pramod K. Julka
  • , Hung Ming Wang
  • , Srihari Prasad
  • , Anil K. D'Cruz
  • , Ljiljana Radosevic-Jelic
  • , Rejnish R. Kumar
  • , Stanislaw Korzeniowski
  • , Jacek Fijuth
  • , Jean Pascal MacHiels
  • , Mark V. Sellers
  • , Ilian Tchakov
  • , David Raben
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology
  • Tata Memorial Hospital
  • Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia
  • Regional Cancer Centre India
  • M. Kopernika
  • AstraZeneca

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of gefitinib given concomitantly and/or as maintenance therapy to standard cisplatin/radiotherapy for previously untreated, unresected, stage III/IV non-metastatic SCCHN. Materials and methods: In this phase II, double-blind, study, 226 patients were randomized to gefitinib 250 mg/day, 500 mg/day or placebo in two phases: a concomitant phase (gefitinib or placebo with chemoradiotherapy), followed by a maintenance phase (gefitinib or placebo alone). Primary endpoint was local disease control rate (LDCR) at 2 years; secondary endpoints were LDCR at 1 year, objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety and tolerability. Results: Gefitinib (250 and 500 mg/day) did not improve 2-year LDCR compared with placebo either when given concomitantly with chemoradiotherapy (32.7% vs. 33.6%, respectively; OR 0.921, 95% CI 0.508, 1.670 [1-sided p = 0.607]) or as maintenance therapy (28.8% vs. 37.4%, respectively; OR 0.684, 95% CI 0.377, 1.241 [1-sided p = 0.894]). Secondary efficacy outcomes were broadly consistent with the 2-year LDCR results. In both doses, gefitinib was well-tolerated and did not adversely affect the safety and tolerability of concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Conclusion: Gefitinib was well-tolerated, but did not improve efficacy compared with placebo when given concomitantly with chemoradiotherapy, or as maintenance therapy alone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-69
Number of pages8
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume100
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 07 2011
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cisplatin
  • Gefitinib
  • Radiotherapy
  • Randomized-phase II
  • SCCHN

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gefitinib plus cisplatin and radiotherapy in previously untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this