Gender differences in the presentation of adult obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with resting gradient - A study of 122 patients

Chin Lon Lin, Cheng Wen Chiang*, Cheng Kuang Shaw, Po Hsien Chu, Chi Jen Chang, Yu Lin Ko

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study investigated gender differences among adult patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (OHCM) and resting gradient. Using outflow gradients >10 mmHg and the presence of asymmetrical septal hypertrophy of the left ventricle as inclusion criteria, 122 patients were identified among patients referred for echocardiographic examinations between May 1990 and October 1996. Clinical, echocardiographical and follow-up data were compared between male and female patients. The female patients were significantly older than male patients (mean age ±SD 66.7±10.5 vs 54.8±12.5 years). The female patients had a smaller interventricular septal wall thickness, less frequent systolic anterior movement of the mitral valve, more frequent association with hypertension, and less frequent association with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and giant T wave inversion. In this study population, adult female patients presented with OHCM 12 years later than males. Whether this represents female patients' reluctance to seek medical attention early, a different disease process that affects predominantly elderly females, or a gender-specific end organ response to aging, hypertension, IHD and other processes, or the protective effects of estrogen remains to be determined.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)859-864
Number of pages6
JournalJapanese Circulation Journal
Volume63
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 1999

Keywords

  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Echocardiography
  • Gender
  • Hypertrophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender differences in the presentation of adult obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with resting gradient - A study of 122 patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this