Health-related quality of life changes in nasopharyngeal cancer patients: A propensity score-matched comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

Abstract

Background Despite the dosimetric advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in treating patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), it remains unclear whether these advantages confer improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to state-of-the-art photon-based techniques such as volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Patients and Methods Patients with NPC eligible for definitive radiation therapy (RT) were invited to participate in the longitudinal observational study. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head & Neck Cancer (FACT-HN) questionnaire at multiple time points: before, during, and after treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to align the IMPT group with the VMAT group. Longitudinal changes in HRQoL were then analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Results From 2008 to 2021, a total of 353 patients were enrolled in the study. After applying PSM at a 1:3 ratio, the final analysis included 213 patients in the VMAT group and 71 patients in the IMPT group. There were no significant differences were noted in the mean changes of FACT-HN scores from baseline between the IMPT and VMAT groups during treatment or throughout the follow-up periods as follows (IMPT vs. VMAT): -13.3 vs -14.4 (during RT), 2.2 vs. 1.0 (3 months post-RT), 5.4 vs. 8.5 (6 months post-RT), 10.8 vs. 10.1 (12 months post-RT), 10.2 vs. 10.5 (24 months post-RT), and 13.2 vs. 11.1 (36 months post-RT). Among all the subscales, only the emotional well-being (EWB) subscale demonstrated a significant difference at 36 months, favoring IMPT with scores of 2.7 versus 1.8 (p = 0.026). No significant differences were detected at other time points or within other subscales of interest. Conclusions This study found no clinically significant differences in overall HRQoL, as measured by the FACT-HN questionnaire, between IMPT and VMAT in the treatment of NPC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1274-1281
Number of pages8
JournalJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume55
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 08 11 2025

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

Keywords

  • nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  • proton therapy
  • quality of life
  • Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy
  • Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Proton Therapy/methods
  • Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/radiotherapy
  • Male
  • Propensity Score
  • Quality of Life
  • Female
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Longitudinal Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health-related quality of life changes in nasopharyngeal cancer patients: A propensity score-matched comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this