Hepatitis B relapse after entecavir or tenofovir alafenamide cessation under anti-viral prophylaxis for cancer chemotherapy

Hsin Wei Fang, Po Lin Tseng, Tsung Hui Hu, Jing Houng Wang, Chao Hung Hung, Sheng Nan Lu, Chien Hung Chen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No study has comparing hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse rates among patients with both cancer and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who completed anti-viral prophylaxis for chemotherapy and then stopped taking entecavir or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF).

METHODS: A total of 227 HBeAg-negative cancer patients without cirrhosis who previously took entecavir (n = 144) or TAF (n = 83) for antiviral prophylaxis were enrolled.

RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of virological and clinical relapse at 2 years was 37% and 10.4%, respectively, in the entecavir group, and 46.7% and 19.5%, respectively, in the TAF group. The multivariate analysis revealed that the use of hematologic malignancy, TAF use, and high-viremia group at baseline were independent risk factors for virological relapse, and use of rituximab, TAF use, higher FIB-4 index and high-viremia group at baseline were independent risk factors for clinical relapse. After propensity score-matching, the patients who discontinued TAF therapy still exhibited higher virological (P = 0.031) and clinical relapse rates (P = 0.012) than did those who discontinued entecavir therapy. The patients were allocated to high- (> 2000 IU/mL), moderate- (between 20 and 2000 IU/mL) and low- (< 20 IU/mL) viremia groups. In the high-viremia group, those who had taken TAF for antiviral prophylaxis had higher rates of virological and clinical relapse than did those who had taken entecavir; in the moderate- and low-viremia groups, no significant difference in virological and clinical relapse rates was detected between the entecavir and TAF groups. Three patients experienced hepatic decompensation upon clinical relapse. All three patients were lymphoma and underwent rituximab therapy. One patient developed acute on chronic liver failure and died even though timely retreatment.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with both cancer and CHB who underwent antiviral prophylaxis, TAF use was associated with a higher chance of HBV relapse than entecavir use after nucleos(t)ide analogue cessation, particularly in the high-viremia group. Patients who are hematologic malignancy and undergo a rituximab-containing cytotoxic therapy should be monitored closely after withdrawal from prophylactic NA treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number79
Pages (from-to)79
JournalVirology Journal
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 03 04 2024

Bibliographical note

© 2024. The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Chemotherapy
  • Chronic hepatitis B
  • Entecavir
  • Rituximab
  • Tenofovir alafenamide
  • Hematologic Neoplasms/chemically induced
  • Recurrence
  • Hepatitis B e Antigens
  • Adenine/therapeutic use
  • Viremia
  • Humans
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Antiviral Agents
  • Hepatitis B Surface Antigens
  • Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy
  • Guanine/analogs & derivatives
  • Rituximab/therapeutic use
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control
  • Hepatitis B virus
  • Tenofovir/therapeutic use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hepatitis B relapse after entecavir or tenofovir alafenamide cessation under anti-viral prophylaxis for cancer chemotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this