How Can OD Consultants and Researchers Assess Gamma Change? A Comparison of Two Analytical Procedures

W. Alan Randolph*, David F. Elloy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Evaluation of organizational development (OD) interventions, especially with regard to gamma change, is criticalfor both OD practitioners and researchers. Yet how to assess gamma change has not been adequately resolved. An 18-month field study of an OD intervention was used to explore empirically two alternative procedures for assessing gamma change-namely the methods of Golembiewski, Billingsley and Yeager (1976b) as compared to a modification of the methods of Terborg, Howard, and Maxwell (1980). Results suggest important differences between the methods and these differences are explored in detail.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-648
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Management
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Can OD Consultants and Researchers Assess Gamma Change? A Comparison of Two Analytical Procedures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this