Abstract
Evaluation of organizational development (OD) interventions, especially with regard to gamma change, is criticalfor both OD practitioners and researchers. Yet how to assess gamma change has not been adequately resolved. An 18-month field study of an OD intervention was used to explore empirically two alternative procedures for assessing gamma change-namely the methods of Golembiewski, Billingsley and Yeager (1976b) as compared to a modification of the methods of Terborg, Howard, and Maxwell (1980). Results suggest important differences between the methods and these differences are explored in detail.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 633-648 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Management |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 12 1989 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How Can OD Consultants and Researchers Assess Gamma Change? A Comparison of Two Analytical Procedures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver