How small is TOO small? New liver constraint is needed— Proton therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with small normal liver

Ching Hsin Lee, Sheng Ping Hung, Ji-Hong Hong, Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang, Ngan-Ming Tsang, Kun-Ming Chan, Jeng Hwei Tseng, Shih Chiang Huang, Shi Ming Lin, Jau Min Lien, Nai Jen Liu, Chen Chun Lin, Wei Ting Chen, Wan Yu Chen, Po Jui Chen, Bing Shen Huang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluated the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with small normal liver volume (NLV) treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) and introduced estimated standard liver volume (eSLV) as a new constraint. Materials and methods HCC patients with NLV < 800 cm 3 and no distant metastasis who received treatment in our proton center were included. The doses of PBT were mainly 72.6 Gray equivalents (GyE) in 22 fractions and 66 GyE in 10 fractions according to tumor locations. The Urata equation was used to calculate eSLV. Results Twenty-two patients were treated between November 2015 and December 2016. The 1-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 40.4% and 81.8%, respectively. The 1-year in-field failure-free rate was 95.5%. NLV ranged from 483.9 to 795.8 cm 3 (median = 673.8 cm 3 ), eSLV ranged from 889.3 to 1290.0 cm 3 (median = 1104.5 cm 3 ), and the resulting NLV/eSLV ratio ranged from 44.3 to 81.2% (median = 57.7%). Non-irradiated liver volume (NILV) ranged from 232.9 to 531.6 cm 3 (median = 391.2 cm 3 ). The NILV/eSLV ratio ranged from 21.2 to 48.0% (median = 33.3%). NLV in the patients who received <30 GyE (rV30) ranged from 319.1 to 633.3 cm 3 (median = 488.2 cm 3 ), and their rV30/eSLV ratio ranged from 30.7 to 58.0%. None of our patients developed liver failure. One patient with initial abnormal liver enzyme levels developed non-classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). Conclusion From the viewpoint of minimal liver toxicity occurring in our patients with NLV < 800 cm 3 , conventional liver constraints involving the use of absolute volume could not accurately predict the risk of RILD. It is reasonable to start using individualized constraints with eSLV for HCC patients undergoing PBT. According to the study results, an NILV/eSLV ratio of >20% and an rV30/eSLV ratio of >30% are acceptable.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0203854
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 09 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How small is TOO small? New liver constraint is needed— Proton therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with small normal liver'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this