Human cumulus-free oocyte maturational profile and in vitro developmental potential after stimulation with recombinant versus urinary FSH

Fu Jen Huang, Kuo Chung Lan, Fu Tsai Kung, Meng Yin Tsai, Chih Yang Chang, Hsuan Wei Huang, Yi Chi Lin, Shiuh Young Chang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: This study compares the influence of recombinant (r)FSH and urinary (u)FSH stimulation on oocyte and embryo quality in patients undergoing ICSI. Methods and Results: Denuded oocyte maturity in ICSI patients was graded on a scale from metaphase II (MII) to prophase for nuclear maturation of oocytes. The relationships of cumulus-free oocyte maturational profiles with in vitro outcome parameters were evaluated. In the study population with an unknown distribution of FSH receptor polymorphisms, the ovarian response to rFSH stimulation was significantly different from that of uFSH stimulation, including lower number of oocytes retrieved/oocytes in MII, higher fertilization rates and higher good quality embryo rates. In the study population with a similar distribution of FSH receptor polymorphisms, the ovarian responses to rFSH were lower numbers of oocytes in MII, higher fertilization rates and higher good quality embryo rates, but the total number of oocytes retrieved was not influenced, in comparison with ovarian stimulation with uFSH. Conclusions: rFSH stimulation appears to influence oocyte quality and subsequent embryo quality in comparison with uFSH stimulation. FSH receptor polymorphisms seem to be an intrinsic factor influencing the ovarian response to FSH stimulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)306-315
Number of pages10
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 02 2004

Keywords

  • Embryo quality
  • FSH
  • ICSI
  • Oocyte quality
  • Ovarian stimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human cumulus-free oocyte maturational profile and in vitro developmental potential after stimulation with recombinant versus urinary FSH'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this