Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): A Series of 137 Patients

Chyi Long Lee, Kai Yun Wu, Hsuan Su, Pei Ju Wu, Chien Min Han, Chih Feng Yen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

85 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hysterectomy in benign disease using transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Design: Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: Tertiary referral medical center. Patients: From May 2010 to August 2011, consecutive patients who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy and without virginity or suspected pelvic inflammation or cul-de-sac obliteration were included. Intervention: Total hysterectomy via transvaginal NOTES. Measurements and Main Results: The study included 137 patients, with mean (SEM) age 46.0 (0.4) years and body mass index 24.7 (0.4). Transvaginal NOTES was successfully performed in 130 patients (94.9%). Fifteen patients underwent concurrent adhesiolysis, and 17 underwent adnexal procedures. Mean (SEM) uterine weight was 450.0 (24.1) g; in 45 patients (34.6%), uterine weight was >500 g, and in 7 (5.4%) it was >1000 g. Operative time was 88.2 (4.1) minutes, with blood loss of 257.7 (23.9) mL. In 2 patients there was intraoperative hemorrhage or unintended cystotomy, and in another 5 transvaginal colpotomy failed because of a narrow vagina, cul-de-sac obliteration by bowel adhesions, or mass obstruction. Complications in these 7 patients (5.1%) were successfully managed via transabdominal laparoscopy. Five patients (3.6%) experienced postoperative urinary retention or febrile morbidity, and recovered uneventfully with conservative treatment. Conclusion: Transvaginal NOTES is a feasible technique for performance of hysterectomy and can be used in procedures that are difficult to complete via conventional vaginal surgery because posterior colpotomy is achievable. This procedure was not impeded by uterine volume, and had the advantage of no abdominal incision.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)818-824
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 09 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 AAGL.

Keywords

  • Hysterectomy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)
  • Vaginal surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): A Series of 137 Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this