Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

  • Cheng Yu Tang
  • , Shih Hung Yang
  • , Chung Pin Li
  • , Yung Yeh Su
  • , Sz Chi Chiu
  • , Li Yuan Bai
  • , Yan Shen Shan
  • , Li Tzong Chen
  • , Shih Chang Chuang
  • , De Chuan Chan
  • , Chia Jui Yen
  • , Cheng Ming Peng
  • , Tai Jan Chiu
  • , Yen Yang Chen
  • , Jen Shi Chen
  • , Nai Jung Chiang*
  • , Wen Chi Chou*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taipei
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • National Taiwan University
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • PharmaEngine, Inc
  • China Medical University Taichung
  • Kaohsiung Medical University
  • Triservice General Hospital Taiwan
  • Chung Shan Medical University
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Chang Gung University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study.

METHODS: In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, p < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, p < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (p = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, p = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)600-607
Number of pages8
JournalPancreatology
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 06 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Gemcitabine
  • Nab-paclitaxel
  • Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Irinotecan/therapeutic use
  • Tegafur/administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
  • Fluorouracil/therapeutic use
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Paclitaxel/administration & dosage
  • Oxonic Acid/administration & dosage
  • Female
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Liposomes
  • Drug Combinations
  • Leucovorin/therapeutic use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this