TY - JOUR
T1 - In-hospital and 3-year clinical outcomes following ad hoc versus staged percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic total occlusion - A real world practice
AU - Fang, Hsiu Yu
AU - Lee, Wei Chieh
AU - Hussein, Hesham
AU - Fang, Chih Yuan
AU - Cheng, Cheng I.
AU - Yang, Cheng Hsu
AU - Chen, Chien Jen
AU - Hang, Chi Ling
AU - Yip, Hon Kan
AU - Lin, Yu Sheng
AU - Wu, Chiung Jen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Background: Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) which was performed immediately after diagnostic catheterization has become the most common way of coronary intervention. However, limited data is available on in-hospital and long-term outcome comparing ad hoc and staged chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI. The aim of our study was to figure the short-term and long-term outcomes after ad hoc or staged CTO PCI. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 512 consecutive patients that underwent 561 CTO PCI procedures between January 2002 and December 2009. Patient basic demographics, lesion characteristics, interventional procedure, devices used and in-hospital outcomes were compared between ad hoc and staged CTO PCI groups. 3-Year clinical outcomes that included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), the need for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were compared. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Results: Four hundred fifty-one patients (80.4%) were enrolled in ad hoc CTO PCI group. Final successful revascularization was higher in ad hoc CTO PCI group compared with staged CTO PCI group (82.9 vs. 77.3%, p= 0.17) without statistical significance. There was no significant difference between ad hoc CTO PCI and staged CTO PCI groups in in-hospital outcomes such as all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, urgent bypass surgery, urgent PCI or complications. Patients with ad hoc CTO PCI had lower rate of all-cause mortality (6.2% vs. 6.5%, p= 0.89), the need for CABG (1.9% vs. 2.1%, p= 0.89) but higher rate of cardiac mortality (1.7% vs. 0.0%, p= 0.21), MI (1.0% vs. 0.0%, p= 0.34), MACE (24.1% vs. 17.5%, p= 0.19) and TVR (17.8% vs. 10.0%, p= 0.069) without statistical significance in 3-year clinical outcomes. Conclusion: 3-Year clinical outcomes compared with ad hoc CTO PCI and staged CTO PCI had insignificant differences between: all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, the need for CABG, MACE and TVR.
AB - Background: Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) which was performed immediately after diagnostic catheterization has become the most common way of coronary intervention. However, limited data is available on in-hospital and long-term outcome comparing ad hoc and staged chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI. The aim of our study was to figure the short-term and long-term outcomes after ad hoc or staged CTO PCI. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 512 consecutive patients that underwent 561 CTO PCI procedures between January 2002 and December 2009. Patient basic demographics, lesion characteristics, interventional procedure, devices used and in-hospital outcomes were compared between ad hoc and staged CTO PCI groups. 3-Year clinical outcomes that included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), the need for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were compared. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Results: Four hundred fifty-one patients (80.4%) were enrolled in ad hoc CTO PCI group. Final successful revascularization was higher in ad hoc CTO PCI group compared with staged CTO PCI group (82.9 vs. 77.3%, p= 0.17) without statistical significance. There was no significant difference between ad hoc CTO PCI and staged CTO PCI groups in in-hospital outcomes such as all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, urgent bypass surgery, urgent PCI or complications. Patients with ad hoc CTO PCI had lower rate of all-cause mortality (6.2% vs. 6.5%, p= 0.89), the need for CABG (1.9% vs. 2.1%, p= 0.89) but higher rate of cardiac mortality (1.7% vs. 0.0%, p= 0.21), MI (1.0% vs. 0.0%, p= 0.34), MACE (24.1% vs. 17.5%, p= 0.19) and TVR (17.8% vs. 10.0%, p= 0.069) without statistical significance in 3-year clinical outcomes. Conclusion: 3-Year clinical outcomes compared with ad hoc CTO PCI and staged CTO PCI had insignificant differences between: all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, the need for CABG, MACE and TVR.
KW - Ad hoc
KW - Chronic total occlusion
KW - In-hospital clinical outcome
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84922229920
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.06.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.06.012
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84922229920
SN - 2214-7632
VL - 4
SP - 73
EP - 80
JO - IJC Heart and Vessels
JF - IJC Heart and Vessels
IS - 1
ER -