In-hospital and 3-year clinical outcomes following ad hoc versus staged percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic total occlusion - A real world practice

  • Hsiu Yu Fang
  • , Wei Chieh Lee
  • , Hesham Hussein
  • , Chih Yuan Fang
  • , Cheng I. Cheng
  • , Cheng Hsu Yang
  • , Chien Jen Chen
  • , Chi Ling Hang
  • , Hon Kan Yip
  • , Yu Sheng Lin
  • , Chiung Jen Wu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) which was performed immediately after diagnostic catheterization has become the most common way of coronary intervention. However, limited data is available on in-hospital and long-term outcome comparing ad hoc and staged chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI. The aim of our study was to figure the short-term and long-term outcomes after ad hoc or staged CTO PCI. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 512 consecutive patients that underwent 561 CTO PCI procedures between January 2002 and December 2009. Patient basic demographics, lesion characteristics, interventional procedure, devices used and in-hospital outcomes were compared between ad hoc and staged CTO PCI groups. 3-Year clinical outcomes that included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), the need for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were compared. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Results: Four hundred fifty-one patients (80.4%) were enrolled in ad hoc CTO PCI group. Final successful revascularization was higher in ad hoc CTO PCI group compared with staged CTO PCI group (82.9 vs. 77.3%, p= 0.17) without statistical significance. There was no significant difference between ad hoc CTO PCI and staged CTO PCI groups in in-hospital outcomes such as all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, urgent bypass surgery, urgent PCI or complications. Patients with ad hoc CTO PCI had lower rate of all-cause mortality (6.2% vs. 6.5%, p= 0.89), the need for CABG (1.9% vs. 2.1%, p= 0.89) but higher rate of cardiac mortality (1.7% vs. 0.0%, p= 0.21), MI (1.0% vs. 0.0%, p= 0.34), MACE (24.1% vs. 17.5%, p= 0.19) and TVR (17.8% vs. 10.0%, p= 0.069) without statistical significance in 3-year clinical outcomes. Conclusion: 3-Year clinical outcomes compared with ad hoc CTO PCI and staged CTO PCI had insignificant differences between: all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, the need for CABG, MACE and TVR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-80
Number of pages8
JournalIJC Heart and Vessels
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Keywords

  • Ad hoc
  • Chronic total occlusion
  • In-hospital clinical outcome
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In-hospital and 3-year clinical outcomes following ad hoc versus staged percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic total occlusion - A real world practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this