Influence of diabetes mellitus on postoperative complications and failure in head and neck free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Pablo Rosado
  • , Hsu Tang Cheng
  • , Chao Min Wu
  • , Fu Chan Wei*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

78 Scopus citations

Abstract

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether diabetic patients have an increased rate of postoperative complications compared to nondiabetic patients after head and neck free flap reconstruction. A systematic review of PubMed Database between 1966 and 2012 was performed. RevMan 5.0 was used for meta-analysis. A retrospective medical chart review of 7890 patients to identify those who had a failed microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck region at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital was also carried out. The result revealed that patients with diabetes mellitus have a 1.76 increased risk of complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-2.79) with minimal heterogeneity (I2 = 22%; p = .28). The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with failed free flaps for head and neck reconstruction is 15%. The incidence of diabetes mellitus in these patients with failed free flaps is 2.3 times higher than in the general population.<copy;2013>

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)615-618
Number of pages4
JournalHead and Neck
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 04 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 37: 615-618, 2015 © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

  • diabetes mellitus
  • evidence-based medicine
  • free flap failure
  • free flap reconstruction
  • head and neck
  • meta-analysis
  • postoperative complication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of diabetes mellitus on postoperative complications and failure in head and neck free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this