Inter-observer variability of portal hemodynamics measured by Doppler ultrasound on three different locations of portal vein

Dar In Tai*, Seng Kee Chuah, Chien Lin Chen, Sing Kai Lo, Chi Sin Changchien, Ing Tzu Li

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Doppler ultrasound is a noninvasive modality for portal hemodynamic study. However, inter-observer variability has been observed. This study has investigated ways to produce less inter-observer variability. Doppler ultrasound portal vein hemodynamic studies were carried out by three well- trained specialists on 20 healthy hospital staff members. The intra-hepatic, first branch, right portal vein, the hilar portal vein, and the extra- hepatic portal vein were chosen for study. With respect to the diameter of portal veins, a significant inter-observer variability was found for the first branch right portal vein and the extra-hepatic portal vein, but not for the hilar portal vein. For maximal portal vein velocity studies, inter- observer variability was not found at any location. A significant failure rate was noted for the measurement of extrahepatic portal vein velocity. Only 8 volunteers had complete data from all of the three investigators. A significant variability was also noted for the average velocity of extrahepatic portal vein. We conclude that Doppler ultrasound hemodynamic studies of the hilar portal vein has the most acceptable inter-observer variability and thus should be used for longitudinal portal hemodynamic studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-66
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Ultrasound
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Doppler ultrasonography
  • Hepatic vein
  • Portal vein

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-observer variability of portal hemodynamics measured by Doppler ultrasound on three different locations of portal vein'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this