Long-term use and risk of major adverse cardiac events: Comparing enzalutamide and abiraterone in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

  • Hung Kai Chen
  • , Po Jung Su*
  • , Yan Lin Wang
  • , Kai Cheng Chang
  • , Yu Li Su
  • , Pei Hung Chang
  • , Feng Che Kuan
  • , Chia Hsun Hsieh
  • , Yung Chia Kuo
  • , Ting Wen Sheng
  • , Ching Fu Chang
  • , Shao Ming Yu
  • , Wen Kuan Huang
  • , Yung-Chang Lin
  • , Din Li Tsan
  • , Kai Jie Yu
  • , Po Hung Lin
  • , Hui Yu Chen
  • , Ying Hsu Chang
  • , See Tong Pang
  • Cheng-Keng Chuang, Edward Chia Cheng Lai
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This is a retrospective cohort study by analyzing a multi-institutional electronic medical records database in Taiwan to compare long-term effectiveness and risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with enzalutamide (ENZ) or abiraterone (AA). Patients aged 20 years and older and newly receiving androgen receptor targeted therapies ENZ or AA from September 2016 to December 2019 were included. We followed patients from initiation of therapies to the occurrence of outcomes (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, PSA progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and MACE), death, the last clinical visit, or December 31, 2020. We performed multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to compare ENZ and AA groups for the measured outcomes. A total of 363 patients treated with either ENZ (n = 157) or AA (n = 206) were identified. The analysis found a significantly higher proportion of patients with a PSA response rate higher than 50% among those receiving ENZ than among those receiving AA (ENZ vs AA: 75.80% vs 63.59%, P =.01). However, there was no significant difference in PSA PFS (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.86; 95% CI 0.63-1.17) and OS (0.68: 0.41-1.14) between the use of ENZ and AA in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients. Regarding the cardiovascular (CV) safety outcome, there was a significantly lower risk of MACE in patients receiving ENZ, compared to patients receiving AA (0.20: 0.07-0.55). The findings suggest that enzalutamide may be more efficacious for PSA response and suitable for chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients with high CV risk profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1191-1201
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Cancer
Volume152
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 03 2023

Bibliographical note

© 2022 UICC.

Keywords

  • androgen receptor targeted therapies
  • major adverse cardiac events
  • metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Humans
  • Nitriles/therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term use and risk of major adverse cardiac events: Comparing enzalutamide and abiraterone in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this