Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening in Relatives With a Family History of Lung Cancer

Chi Liang Wang, Kuo Hsuan Hsu, Ya Hsuan Chang, Chao Chi Ho, Chun Ju Chiang, Kun Chieh Chen, Yun Chung Cheung, Pei Ching Huang, Yu Ruei Chen, Chih Yi Chen, Chung Ping Hsu, Jiun Yi Hsia, Hsuan Yu Chen, Shi Yi Yang, Yao Jen Li, Tsung Ying Yang, Jeng Sen Tseng, Cheng Yen Chuang, Chao A. Hsiung, Yuh Min ChenMing Shyan Huang, Chong Jen Yu, Kuan Yu Chen, Wu Chou Su, Jeremy J.W. Chen, Sung Liang Yu, Chien Jen Chen, Pan Chyr Yang, Ying Huang Tsai, Gee Chen Chang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: The role of a family history of lung cancer (LCFH) in screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has not been prospectively investigated with long-term follow-up. Methods: A multicenter prospective study with up to three rounds of annual LDCT screening was conducted to determine the detection rate of lung cancer (LC) in asymptomatic first- or second-degree relatives of LCFH. Results: From 2007 to 2011, there were 1102 participants enrolled, including 805 and 297 from simplex and multiplex families (MFs), respectively (54.2% women and 70.0% never-smokers). The last follow-up date was May 5, 2021. The overall LC detection rate was 4.5% (50 of 1102). The detection rate in MF was 9.4% (19 of 202) and 4.4% (4 of 91) in never-smokers and in those who smoked, respectively. The corresponding rates for simplex families were 3.7% (21 of 569) and 2.7% (6 of 223), respectively. Of these, 68.0% and 22.0% of cases with stage I and IV diseases, respectively. LC diagnoses within a 3-year interval from the initial screening tend to be younger, have a higher detection rate, and have stage I disease; thereafter, more stage III–IV disease and 66.7% (16 of 24) with negative or semipositive nodules in initial computed tomography scans. Within the 6-year interval, only maternal (modified rate ratio = 4.46, 95% confidence interval: 2.32–8.56) or maternal relative history of LC (modified rate ratio = 5.41, 95% confidence interval: 2.84–10.30) increased the risk of LC. Conclusions: LCFH is a risk factor for LC and is increased with MF history, among never-smokers, younger adults, and those with maternal relatives with LC. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the mortality benefit of LDCT screening in those with LCFH.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1492-1503
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 2023

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Early onset lung cancer
  • Family history of lung cancer
  • Low-dose computed tomography
  • Lung cancer screening
  • Never smokers
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
  • Humans
  • Risk Factors
  • Male
  • Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
  • Early Detection of Cancer/methods
  • Mass Screening
  • Adult
  • Female

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening in Relatives With a Family History of Lung Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this