Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening in Relatives With a Family History of Lung Cancer

  • Chi Liang Wang
  • , Kuo Hsuan Hsu
  • , Ya Hsuan Chang
  • , Chao Chi Ho
  • , Chun Ju Chiang
  • , Kun Chieh Chen
  • , Yun Chung Cheung
  • , Pei Ching Huang
  • , Yu Ruei Chen
  • , Chih Yi Chen
  • , Chung Ping Hsu
  • , Jiun Yi Hsia
  • , Hsuan Yu Chen
  • , Shi Yi Yang
  • , Yao Jen Li
  • , Tsung Ying Yang
  • , Jeng Sen Tseng
  • , Cheng Yen Chuang
  • , Chao A. Hsiung
  • , Yuh Min Chen
  • Ming Shyan Huang, Chong Jen Yu, Kuan Yu Chen, Wu Chou Su, Jeremy J.W. Chen, Sung Liang Yu, Chien Jen Chen, Pan Chyr Yang, Ying Huang Tsai, Gee Chen Chang*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: The role of a family history of lung cancer (LCFH) in screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has not been prospectively investigated with long-term follow-up. Methods: A multicenter prospective study with up to three rounds of annual LDCT screening was conducted to determine the detection rate of lung cancer (LC) in asymptomatic first- or second-degree relatives of LCFH. Results: From 2007 to 2011, there were 1102 participants enrolled, including 805 and 297 from simplex and multiplex families (MFs), respectively (54.2% women and 70.0% never-smokers). The last follow-up date was May 5, 2021. The overall LC detection rate was 4.5% (50 of 1102). The detection rate in MF was 9.4% (19 of 202) and 4.4% (4 of 91) in never-smokers and in those who smoked, respectively. The corresponding rates for simplex families were 3.7% (21 of 569) and 2.7% (6 of 223), respectively. Of these, 68.0% and 22.0% of cases with stage I and IV diseases, respectively. LC diagnoses within a 3-year interval from the initial screening tend to be younger, have a higher detection rate, and have stage I disease; thereafter, more stage III–IV disease and 66.7% (16 of 24) with negative or semipositive nodules in initial computed tomography scans. Within the 6-year interval, only maternal (modified rate ratio = 4.46, 95% confidence interval: 2.32–8.56) or maternal relative history of LC (modified rate ratio = 5.41, 95% confidence interval: 2.84–10.30) increased the risk of LC. Conclusions: LCFH is a risk factor for LC and is increased with MF history, among never-smokers, younger adults, and those with maternal relatives with LC. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the mortality benefit of LDCT screening in those with LCFH.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1492-1503
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 2023

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Early onset lung cancer
  • Family history of lung cancer
  • Low-dose computed tomography
  • Lung cancer screening
  • Never smokers
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
  • Humans
  • Risk Factors
  • Male
  • Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
  • Early Detection of Cancer/methods
  • Mass Screening
  • Adult
  • Female

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening in Relatives With a Family History of Lung Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this