Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study

Odontuya Dorj; Chin Kai Lin; Eisner Salamanca; Yu Hwa Pan; Yi Fan Wu; Yung Szu Hsu; Jerry C.Y. Lin; Hsi Kuei Lin; Wei Jen Chang

doi:10.3390/ijerph19031750

Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study

Odontuya Dorj, Chin Kai Lin, Eisner Salamanca, Yu Hwa Pan, Yi Fan Wu, Yung Szu Hsu, Jerry C.Y. Lin, Hsi Kuei Lin^*, Wei Jen Chang^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Graduate Institue of Dental and Craniofacial Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Few studies have compared marginal bone loss (MBL) around implant-retaining over-dentures (IODs) vs. implant-supported fixed prostheses (FPs). This study evaluated the mean MBL and radiographic bone-implant interface contact (r-BIIC) around IODs and implant-supported FPs. We also investigated osseointegration and MBL around non-submerged dental implants. We meas-ured the changes between the MBL in the mesial and distal sites immediately after prosthetic delivery and after one year. The mean MBL and its changes in the IOD group were significantly higher. The mean percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL and its changes in males were significantly higher in the IOD group. The percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL in the lower site in the IOD group was significantly higher. Regarding MBL, the location of the implant was the only significant factor in the IOD group, while gender was the only significant predictor in the FP group. Regarding the r-BIIC percentage, gender was a significant factor in the FP group. We concluded that non-submerged dental implants restored with FPs and IODs maintained stable bone remodeling one year after prosthetic delivery.

Original language	English
Article number	1750
Journal	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume	19
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031750
State	Published - 01 02 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Li-censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

Implant-retained overdenture
Implant-supported fixed prosthesis
Marginal bone loss
Non-submerged dental implant
Radiographic bone-implant interface contact

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.3390/ijerph19031750

Cite this

Dorj, O., Lin, C. K., Salamanca, E., Pan, Y. H., Wu, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Lin, J. C. Y., Lin, H. K., & Chang, W. J. (2022). Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), Article 1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031750

@article{98febc19273a4a4fa19ff36e38b7e3b1,

title = "Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study",

abstract = "Few studies have compared marginal bone loss (MBL) around implant-retaining over-dentures (IODs) vs. implant-supported fixed prostheses (FPs). This study evaluated the mean MBL and radiographic bone-implant interface contact (r-BIIC) around IODs and implant-supported FPs. We also investigated osseointegration and MBL around non-submerged dental implants. We meas-ured the changes between the MBL in the mesial and distal sites immediately after prosthetic delivery and after one year. The mean MBL and its changes in the IOD group were significantly higher. The mean percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL and its changes in males were significantly higher in the IOD group. The percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL in the lower site in the IOD group was significantly higher. Regarding MBL, the location of the implant was the only significant factor in the IOD group, while gender was the only significant predictor in the FP group. Regarding the r-BIIC percentage, gender was a significant factor in the FP group. We concluded that non-submerged dental implants restored with FPs and IODs maintained stable bone remodeling one year after prosthetic delivery.",

keywords = "Implant-retained overdenture, Implant-supported fixed prosthesis, Marginal bone loss, Non-submerged dental implant, Radiographic bone-implant interface contact",

author = "Odontuya Dorj and Lin, {Chin Kai} and Eisner Salamanca and Pan, {Yu Hwa} and Wu, {Yi Fan} and Hsu, {Yung Szu} and Lin, {Jerry C.Y.} and Lin, {Hsi Kuei} and Chang, {Wei Jen}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 by the authors. Li-censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.",

year = "2022",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3390/ijerph19031750",

language = "英语",

volume = "19",

journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",

issn = "1661-7827",

publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",

number = "3",

}

Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study. / Dorj, Odontuya; Lin, Chin Kai; Salamanca, Eisner et al.
In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1750, 01.02.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up

T2 - A Retrospective Study

AU - Dorj, Odontuya

AU - Lin, Chin Kai

AU - Salamanca, Eisner

AU - Pan, Yu Hwa

AU - Wu, Yi Fan

AU - Hsu, Yung Szu

AU - Lin, Jerry C.Y.

AU - Lin, Hsi Kuei

AU - Chang, Wei Jen

PY - 2022/2/1

Y1 - 2022/2/1

N2 - Few studies have compared marginal bone loss (MBL) around implant-retaining over-dentures (IODs) vs. implant-supported fixed prostheses (FPs). This study evaluated the mean MBL and radiographic bone-implant interface contact (r-BIIC) around IODs and implant-supported FPs. We also investigated osseointegration and MBL around non-submerged dental implants. We meas-ured the changes between the MBL in the mesial and distal sites immediately after prosthetic delivery and after one year. The mean MBL and its changes in the IOD group were significantly higher. The mean percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL and its changes in males were significantly higher in the IOD group. The percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL in the lower site in the IOD group was significantly higher. Regarding MBL, the location of the implant was the only significant factor in the IOD group, while gender was the only significant predictor in the FP group. Regarding the r-BIIC percentage, gender was a significant factor in the FP group. We concluded that non-submerged dental implants restored with FPs and IODs maintained stable bone remodeling one year after prosthetic delivery.

AB - Few studies have compared marginal bone loss (MBL) around implant-retaining over-dentures (IODs) vs. implant-supported fixed prostheses (FPs). This study evaluated the mean MBL and radiographic bone-implant interface contact (r-BIIC) around IODs and implant-supported FPs. We also investigated osseointegration and MBL around non-submerged dental implants. We meas-ured the changes between the MBL in the mesial and distal sites immediately after prosthetic delivery and after one year. The mean MBL and its changes in the IOD group were significantly higher. The mean percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL and its changes in males were significantly higher in the IOD group. The percentage of r-BIIC was significantly higher in the FP group. MBL in the lower site in the IOD group was significantly higher. Regarding MBL, the location of the implant was the only significant factor in the IOD group, while gender was the only significant predictor in the FP group. Regarding the r-BIIC percentage, gender was a significant factor in the FP group. We concluded that non-submerged dental implants restored with FPs and IODs maintained stable bone remodeling one year after prosthetic delivery.

KW - Implant-retained overdenture

KW - Implant-supported fixed prosthesis

KW - Marginal bone loss

KW - Non-submerged dental implant

KW - Radiographic bone-implant interface contact

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123840883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph19031750

DO - 10.3390/ijerph19031750

M3 - 文章

C2 - 35162773

AN - SCOPUS:85123840883

SN - 1661-7827

VL - 19

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

IS - 3

M1 - 1750

ER -

Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this