Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Medical physics aspects of cancer care in the Asia Pacific region: 2014 survey results

  • Tomas Kron*
  • , H. A. Azhari
  • , E. O. Voon
  • , K. Y. Cheung
  • , P. Ravindran
  • , D. Soejoko
  • , K. Inamura
  • , Y. Han
  • , N. M. Ung
  • , Bolortuya TsedenIsh
  • , U. M. Win
  • , R. Srivastava
  • , S. Marsh
  • , S. Farrukh
  • , L. Rodriguez
  • , Men Kuo
  • , S. Baggarley
  • , A. H. DilipKumara
  • , C. C. Lee
  • , A. Krisanachinda
  • X. C. Nguyen, K. H. Ng
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
  • Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
  • Gono Bishwabidyalay
  • Ministry of Health
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Christian Medical College
  • University of Indonesia
  • The University of Osaka
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • University of Malaya
  • National Cancer Centre
  • Ministry of Health
  • Ghent University
  • University of Canterbury
  • Atomic Energy Medical Centre
  • Department of Health Manila
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • National University Cancer Institute
  • Teaching Hospital Karapitiya
  • Chulalongkorn University
  • National Cancer Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

It was the aim of this work to assess and track the workload, working conditions and professional recognition of radiation oncology medical physicists (ROMPs) in the Asia Pacific region over time. In this third survey since 2008, a structured questionnaire was mailed in 2014 to 22 senior medical physicists representing 23 countries. As in previous surveys the questionnaire covered seven themes: 1 education, training and professional certification, 2 staffing, 3 typical tasks, 4 professional organisations, 5 resources, 6 research and teaching, and 7 job satisfaction. The response rate of 100 % is a result of performing a survey through a network, which allows easy follow-up. The replies cover 4841 ROMPs in 23 countries. Compared to 2008, the number of medical physicists in many countries has doubled. However, the number of experienced ROMPs compared to the overall workforce is still small, especially in low and middle income countries. The increase in staff is matched by a similar increase in the number of treatment units over the years. Furthermore, the number of countries using complex techniques (IMRT, IGRT) or installing high end equipment (tomotherapy, robotic linear accelerators) is increasing. Overall, ROMPs still feel generally overworked and the professional recognition, while varying widely, appears to be improving only slightly. Radiation oncology medical physics practice has not changed significantly over the last 6 years in the Asia Pacific Region even if the number of physicists and the number and complexity of treatment techniques and technologies have increased dramatically.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)493-501
Number of pages9
JournalAustralasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 29 09 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Asia Pacific region
  • Radiation oncology medical physics
  • Resources
  • Work practice
  • Workload

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Medical physics aspects of cancer care in the Asia Pacific region: 2014 survey results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this