Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Metastatic ependymoma: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis of prognostic factors

  • Stergios Zacharoulis*
  • , Lingyun Ji
  • , Ian F. Pollack
  • , Patricia Duffner
  • , Russel Geyer
  • , Jacques Grill
  • , Steven Schild
  • , Tang Her Jaing
  • , Maura Massimino
  • , Jonathan Finlay
  • , Richard Sposto
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center Seattle
  • Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose. Metastatic ependymoma is exceedingly rare at diagnosis with variable prognosis reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors in children with metastatic ependymoma. Procedure. Data regarding diagnosis, treatment and follow-up for 40 patients from eight institutional cohorts were collected. Results. Twenty-nine (72%) patients were less than 36 months of age at the time of diagnosis, 28% were females, and 90% of the patients had posterior fossa tumors. Gross total resection (GTR) of the primary tumor was achieved in 16 patients (40%). Adjuvant therapy was variable and included craniospinal irradiation (CSRT), chemotherapy, and chemotherapy with focal irradiation. The 5-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis were 29% (±7%) and 43% (±8%), respectively. Age at diagnosis was associated significantly with both EFS and OS (P < 0.001 for EFS, and P = 0.01 for OS). Patients who were 24-35 months of age at diagnosis had a 5-year EFS of 66% and a 5-year OS of 73%; both survival rates were superior to those of patients younger than 24 months of age or older than 36 months. Patients with GTR achieved a 5-year EFS of 35% and OS of 59%, compared to a 5-year EFS of 25% and OS of 32% for patients who did not achieve GTR (P = 0.12 for EFS, P = 0.03 for OS). Conclusions. GTR should be attempted in patients with metastatic ependymoma. A subgroup of patients between 24 and 35 months might have a favorable outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-235
Number of pages5
JournalPediatric Blood and Cancer
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 02 2008
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Metastatic ependymoma
  • Prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Metastatic ependymoma: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis of prognostic factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this