Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: ten-years' experience in a single institute.

Hsin Chieh Huang*, Ming Li Hsieh, Shih Tsung Huang, Ke Hung Tsui, Rong Hau Lai, Phei Lang Chang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A retrospective review was made of patients who received vasectomy reversal from 1989 to 1998 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) in Linkou, Taiwan. The patency rate and partner pregnancy rates were also analyzed. METHODS: Seventy patients underwent a vasovasostomy at CGMH from 1989 to 1998. Postoperative semen analysis and achievement of pregnancy in a partner were examined. Various preoperative factors were also examined and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients ranged from 30 to 58 (average, 40.8 +/- 6.5) years old. The most common reason for requesting a vasovasostomy was divorce (42.3%). The patency rate was 85.7% (36/42), and the pregnancy rate was 40.6% (13/32). However, if patients receiving a vasovasostomy for reasons other than to achieve pregnancy (i.e., pain, erectile dysfunction, or infertility of the wife) were excluded, the pregnancy rate reached 50.0% (13/26). Three patients received a second vasovasostomy; patency was noted in 2, and pregnancy was achieved in the partner of 1. Of the 5 patients receiving a vasovasostomy due to post-vasectomy pain syndrome, 3 felt that their condition had improved. CONCLUSION: The patency and pregnancy rates of vasovasostomies in CGMH were 85.7% and 50.0%, respectively. Repeat surgery could be considered an effective means of restoring fertility if an initial vasovasostomy failed. Moreover, a vasovasostomy appeared to be an effective means of treating post-vasectomy pain syndrome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-457
Number of pages5
JournalChang Gung Medical Journal
Volume25
Issue number7
StatePublished - 07 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: ten-years' experience in a single institute.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this