TY - JOUR
T1 - Mortality in tongue cancer patients treated by curative surgery
T2 - A retrospective cohort study from CGRD
AU - Tsai, Ming Shao
AU - Lai, Chia Hsuan
AU - Lee, Chuan Pin
AU - Yang, Yao Hsu
AU - Chen, Pau Chung
AU - Kang, Chung Jan
AU - Chang, Geng He
AU - Tsai, Yao Te
AU - Lu, Chang Hsien
AU - Chien, Chih Yen
AU - Young, Chi Kuang
AU - Fang, Ku Hao
AU - Liu, Chin Jui
AU - Yeh, Re Ming A.
AU - Chen, Wen Cheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Tsai et al.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Background. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of surgical treatment of tongue cancer patients in three different age groups. Methods. From 2004 to 2013, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1,712 patients who were treated in the four institutions constituting the Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals (CGMH). We divided and studied the patients in three age groups: Group 1, younger (<65 years); Group 2, young old (65 to <75); and Group 3, older old patients (≥75 years). Results. Multivariate analyses determined the unfavorable, independent prognostic factors of overall survival to be male sex, older age, advanced stage, advanced T, N classifications, and surgery plus chemotherapy. No significant differences were found in adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of death in early-stage disease (stage I-II) among Group 1 (HR 1.0), Group 2 (HR 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.87-2.34], p = 0.158), and Group 3 (HR 1.22, 95% CI [0.49-3.03], p = 0.664) patients. However, amongst advanced-stage patients (stage (III-IV)), Group 3 (HR 2.53, 95% CI [1.46-4.38], p = 0.001) showed significantly worse survival than the other two groups after other variables were adjusted for. Fourteen out of 21 older old, advanced-staged patients finally died, and most of the mortalities were non-cancerogenic (9/14, 64.3%), and mostly occurred within one year (12/14, 85%) after cancer diagnosis. These non-cancer cause of death included underlying diseases in combination with infection, pneumonia, poor nutrition status, and trauma. Conclusions. Our study showed that advanced T classification (T3-4), positive nodal metastasis (N1-3) and poorly differentiated tumor predicted poor survival for all patients. Outcome of early-stage patients (stage I-II) among three age groups were not significantly different. However, for advanced-stage patients (stage III-IV), the older old patients (≥75) had significantly worse survival than the other two patient groups. Therefore, for early-stage patients, age should not deny them to receive optimal treatments. However, older old patients (≥75) with advanced cancer should be comprehensively assessed by geriatric tools before surgical treatment and combined with intensive postoperative care to improve outcome, especially the unfavorable non- cancerogenic mortalities within one year after cancer diagnosis.
AB - Background. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of surgical treatment of tongue cancer patients in three different age groups. Methods. From 2004 to 2013, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1,712 patients who were treated in the four institutions constituting the Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals (CGMH). We divided and studied the patients in three age groups: Group 1, younger (<65 years); Group 2, young old (65 to <75); and Group 3, older old patients (≥75 years). Results. Multivariate analyses determined the unfavorable, independent prognostic factors of overall survival to be male sex, older age, advanced stage, advanced T, N classifications, and surgery plus chemotherapy. No significant differences were found in adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of death in early-stage disease (stage I-II) among Group 1 (HR 1.0), Group 2 (HR 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.87-2.34], p = 0.158), and Group 3 (HR 1.22, 95% CI [0.49-3.03], p = 0.664) patients. However, amongst advanced-stage patients (stage (III-IV)), Group 3 (HR 2.53, 95% CI [1.46-4.38], p = 0.001) showed significantly worse survival than the other two groups after other variables were adjusted for. Fourteen out of 21 older old, advanced-staged patients finally died, and most of the mortalities were non-cancerogenic (9/14, 64.3%), and mostly occurred within one year (12/14, 85%) after cancer diagnosis. These non-cancer cause of death included underlying diseases in combination with infection, pneumonia, poor nutrition status, and trauma. Conclusions. Our study showed that advanced T classification (T3-4), positive nodal metastasis (N1-3) and poorly differentiated tumor predicted poor survival for all patients. Outcome of early-stage patients (stage I-II) among three age groups were not significantly different. However, for advanced-stage patients (stage III-IV), the older old patients (≥75) had significantly worse survival than the other two patient groups. Therefore, for early-stage patients, age should not deny them to receive optimal treatments. However, older old patients (≥75) with advanced cancer should be comprehensively assessed by geriatric tools before surgical treatment and combined with intensive postoperative care to improve outcome, especially the unfavorable non- cancerogenic mortalities within one year after cancer diagnosis.
KW - Age
KW - CGRD (Chang Gung Research Database)
KW - Old
KW - Oral cancer
KW - Oral cavity
KW - Prognosis
KW - Risk factors
KW - Survival
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85006380076
U2 - 10.7717/peerj.2794
DO - 10.7717/peerj.2794
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85006380076
SN - 2167-8359
VL - 2016
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - PeerJ
JF - PeerJ
IS - 12
ER -