TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal analysis of intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography for predicting myocardial functional recovery in patients with acute myocardial infarction
AU - Wang, Chao Hung
AU - Cherng, Wen-Chin
AU - Hung, Ming Jui
AU - Kuo, Li Tang
PY - 2002/10/1
Y1 - 2002/10/1
N2 - Objective: This study attempted to determine the optimal interpretation method of intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) for predicting myocardial functional recovery in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Background: Assessment of the myocardial contrast effect is subjective and there is currently no universal agreement on the pulsing interval (PI) for imaging. Methods: Twenty-nine patients underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) 4.8 ± 1.9 days after acute myocardial infarction and intravenous MCE before and 24 hours after PTCA by using intermittent harmonic angioimaging at a series of PIs of 4, 8, 12, and 16 cardiac cycles. Adequate contrast enhancement was defined by homogeneous (MCE-homo score) and heterogeneous patterns (MCEheter score), and by a combination of intensity threshold and computed planimetry (MCEcom score). Adequate contrast enhancement at a shorter PI defined a higher MCE score (1 vs 5). The regional wall motion in the risk area was assessed before PTCA and 2 months after PTCA to evaluate functional recovery. Results: A significant improvement after PTCA was noted in the MCEhomo score (3.2 ± 1.7 vs 3.6 ± 1.7, P = .008) and the MCEcom score (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 3.3 ± 1.5, P < .0001), but not in the MCEheter score (4.3 ± 1.3 vs 4.5 ± 1.1, P = .058). Twenty-four hours after PTCA, segments with functional recovery had a higher MCEheter score (4.9 ± 0.5 vs 3.8 ± 1.6, P = .002), MCEhomo score (4.2 ± 1.4 vs 2.6 ± 1.9, P < .0001), and MCEcom score (3.8 ± 1.2 vs 2.1 ± 1.4, P < .0001) than those without. For the prediction of function recovery, MCEheter generally had a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity and accuracy than did MCEhomo and MCEcom. MCEcom had the best accuracy (83%) with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 61% at a PI of 16 cardiac cycles. Conclusion: Using a combination of intensity threshold and computed planimetry for interpreting myocardial contrast enhancement at a long PI can optimize the value of MCE in predicting functional recovery after PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
AB - Objective: This study attempted to determine the optimal interpretation method of intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) for predicting myocardial functional recovery in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Background: Assessment of the myocardial contrast effect is subjective and there is currently no universal agreement on the pulsing interval (PI) for imaging. Methods: Twenty-nine patients underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) 4.8 ± 1.9 days after acute myocardial infarction and intravenous MCE before and 24 hours after PTCA by using intermittent harmonic angioimaging at a series of PIs of 4, 8, 12, and 16 cardiac cycles. Adequate contrast enhancement was defined by homogeneous (MCE-homo score) and heterogeneous patterns (MCEheter score), and by a combination of intensity threshold and computed planimetry (MCEcom score). Adequate contrast enhancement at a shorter PI defined a higher MCE score (1 vs 5). The regional wall motion in the risk area was assessed before PTCA and 2 months after PTCA to evaluate functional recovery. Results: A significant improvement after PTCA was noted in the MCEhomo score (3.2 ± 1.7 vs 3.6 ± 1.7, P = .008) and the MCEcom score (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 3.3 ± 1.5, P < .0001), but not in the MCEheter score (4.3 ± 1.3 vs 4.5 ± 1.1, P = .058). Twenty-four hours after PTCA, segments with functional recovery had a higher MCEheter score (4.9 ± 0.5 vs 3.8 ± 1.6, P = .002), MCEhomo score (4.2 ± 1.4 vs 2.6 ± 1.9, P < .0001), and MCEcom score (3.8 ± 1.2 vs 2.1 ± 1.4, P < .0001) than those without. For the prediction of function recovery, MCEheter generally had a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity and accuracy than did MCEhomo and MCEcom. MCEcom had the best accuracy (83%) with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 61% at a PI of 16 cardiac cycles. Conclusion: Using a combination of intensity threshold and computed planimetry for interpreting myocardial contrast enhancement at a long PI can optimize the value of MCE in predicting functional recovery after PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036781916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/mje.2002.123957
DO - 10.1067/mje.2002.123957
M3 - 文章
C2 - 12411915
AN - SCOPUS:0036781916
SN - 0894-7317
VL - 15
SP - 1262
EP - 1268
JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
IS - 10 II
ER -