TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
T2 - Titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages
AU - Niu, Chi Chien
AU - Liao, Jen Chung
AU - Chen, Wen Jer
AU - Chen, Lih Huei
PY - 2010/7
Y1 - 2010/7
N2 - Study Desigh: A prospective study was performed in case with cervical spondylosis who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with titanium or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. objective: To find out which fusion cage yielded better clinical and radiographic results. summary of background data: Although use of autogenous iliac-bone grafts in ACDF for cervical disc diseases remain standard surgical procedure, donor site morbidity and graft collapse or breakage are concerns. Cage technology was developed to prevent these complications. However, there is no comparison regarding the efficacy between titanium and PEEK cage. methods: January 2005 to January 2006, 53 patients who had 1 and 2-levels ACDF with titanium or PEEK cages were evaluated. We measured the rate and amount of interspace collapse, segmental sagittal angulations, and the radiographic fusion success rate. Odom criteria were used to assess the clinical results. results: The fusion rate was higher in the PEEK group (100% vs. 86.5%, P=0.0335). There was no significant difference between both groups in loss of cervical lordosis (3.2±2.4 vs. 2.8±3.4, P=0.166). The mean anterior interspace collapse (1.6±1.0mm) in the titanium group was significantly higher than the collapse of the PEEK group (0.5±0.6mm) (P<0.0001). The mean posterior interspace collapse was also higher in the titanium group (1.6±0.9mm vs. 0.5±0.5mm, P<0.0001). An interspace collapse of 3mm or greater was observed in 16.2% of the patients in the titanium group, compared with zero patients in the PEEK group (P<0.0001). The PEEK group achieved an 80% rate of successful clinical outcomes, compared with 75% in the titanium group (P=0.6642). conclusions: The PEEK cage is superior to the titanium cage in maintaining cervical interspace height and radiographic fusion after 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical decompression procedures.
AB - Study Desigh: A prospective study was performed in case with cervical spondylosis who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with titanium or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. objective: To find out which fusion cage yielded better clinical and radiographic results. summary of background data: Although use of autogenous iliac-bone grafts in ACDF for cervical disc diseases remain standard surgical procedure, donor site morbidity and graft collapse or breakage are concerns. Cage technology was developed to prevent these complications. However, there is no comparison regarding the efficacy between titanium and PEEK cage. methods: January 2005 to January 2006, 53 patients who had 1 and 2-levels ACDF with titanium or PEEK cages were evaluated. We measured the rate and amount of interspace collapse, segmental sagittal angulations, and the radiographic fusion success rate. Odom criteria were used to assess the clinical results. results: The fusion rate was higher in the PEEK group (100% vs. 86.5%, P=0.0335). There was no significant difference between both groups in loss of cervical lordosis (3.2±2.4 vs. 2.8±3.4, P=0.166). The mean anterior interspace collapse (1.6±1.0mm) in the titanium group was significantly higher than the collapse of the PEEK group (0.5±0.6mm) (P<0.0001). The mean posterior interspace collapse was also higher in the titanium group (1.6±0.9mm vs. 0.5±0.5mm, P<0.0001). An interspace collapse of 3mm or greater was observed in 16.2% of the patients in the titanium group, compared with zero patients in the PEEK group (P<0.0001). The PEEK group achieved an 80% rate of successful clinical outcomes, compared with 75% in the titanium group (P=0.6642). conclusions: The PEEK cage is superior to the titanium cage in maintaining cervical interspace height and radiographic fusion after 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical decompression procedures.
KW - anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
KW - polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage
KW - titanium cage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954656088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181af3a84
DO - 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181af3a84
M3 - 文章
C2 - 20124907
AN - SCOPUS:77954656088
SN - 1536-0652
VL - 23
SP - 310
EP - 316
JO - Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques
JF - Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques
IS - 5
ER -