Perampanel Treatment for Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit

Chen Jui Ho, Chih Hsiang Lin, Yan Ting Lu, Fu Yuan Shih, Che Wei Hsu, Wan Chen Tsai, Meng Han Tsai*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Objective: Perampanel is a novel anti-epileptic drug (AED) which acts as a non-competitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist to reduce glutamate-mediated postsynaptic excitation. Previous animal studies and a few case reports/series have suggested that it may be effective to treat refractory status epilepticus (RSE). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 67 consecutive patients with RSE, of whom 22 received perampanel. The clinical features, epidemiology-based mortality score in status epilepticus, status epilepticus severity score, seizure control, functional outcome, RSE etiology, and electroencephalogram findings were collected. Responder to perampanel was defined as seizure resolution within 4 days of therapy with perampanel being the last AED used plus no recurrence during hospitalization. Results: Eight of the 22 (36.4%) RSE patients fulfilled the definition of responder to perampanel. An additional 1 patient responded to perampanel after 4 days of treatment. In total, perampanel was the last AED in 9 (40.1%) patients. Among the 8 responders to perampanel, 5 had convulsive SE, 1 had non-convulsive SE, and 2 had focal motor SE. The responders accounted for both of the patients with focal motor SE (100%), 5 (33.3%) of the 15 patients with convulsive SE, and 1 (20%) of the 5 patients with non-convulsive SE. The ictal and inter-ictal activities also decreased after perampanel therapy, and three patients (13.6%) had preferable outcomes at last follow-up. Conclusions: Perampanel may be an effective add-on treatment for RSE even in patients who failed multiple AEDs. Our study suggests that perampanel may be more effective for focal motor SE and convulsive SE than non-convulsive SE. As most previous studies have focused on non-convulsive SE, further studies are warranted to clarify the effectiveness of perampanel for different subtypes of SE.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-29
Number of pages6
JournalNeurocritical Care
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 08 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.

Keywords

  • AMPA
  • Intensive care unit
  • Perampanel
  • Prognosis
  • Refractory status epilepticus
  • Status epilepticus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perampanel Treatment for Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this