Performance of a large reactor in degrading sulfamethazine in water using UV and persulfate

Chia Chang Lin*, Min Shan Wu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of a large reactor in the degradation of sulfamethazine (SMT) in water using UV and persulfate (PS), as well as the effects of UV wavelength, PS concentration, initial SMT concentration, and addition of anions on this process. The degradation efficiency and rate of SMT using the UV-254 nm/PS process were higher than those using the UV-365 nm/PS process. The degradation efficiency of SMT using the UV-254 nm/PS process increased with PS concentration. However, PS at high concentration inhibited the SMT degradation rate using the UV-254 nm/PS process. Reducing the initial SMT concentration increased the degradation efficiency and rate of SMT under UV-254 nm. The SMT degradation using the UV-254 nm/PS process in a large reactor followed pseudo-first-order kinetics. Radical scavenging tests revealed that SO4 [rad] dominated in the SMT degradation using the UV-254 nm/PS process in a large reactor. Adding anions decreased the degradation efficiency and rate of SMT using the UV-254 nm/PS process in the order NO3 > SO4 2− > Cl. In the UV-254 nm/PS process, SMT (5 mg/L) was completely degraded in 2 min at a PS concentration of 10 mM without the addition of anions. Therefore, a large reactor with high PS concentrations is very effective in degrading SMT in water using the UV-254 nm/PS process.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100874
JournalJournal of Water Process Engineering
Volume31
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Antibiotic
  • Degradation
  • Persulfate
  • Sulfamethazine
  • UV

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of a large reactor in degrading sulfamethazine in water using UV and persulfate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this