Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice

  • the PERMIT pooled analysis participants
  • Hospital Universitario La Fe
  • University of Melbourne
  • Aichi Medical University
  • Konkuk University
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata
  • Eisai Europe Ltd.
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
  • Kork Epilepsy Center
  • University of Freiburg
  • A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
  • Chang Gung University
  • Christian Doppler University Hospital
  • Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

73 Scopus citations

Abstract

The PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study was a pooled analysis of data from 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which people with epilepsy (PWE; focal and generalized) were treated with perampanel (PER). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included 50% responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit); in PWE with status epilepticus, response was defined as seizures under control. Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. The Full Analysis Set included 5193 PWE. Retention, effectiveness and safety/tolerability were assessed in 4721, 4392 and 4617, respectively. Retention on PER treatment at 3, 6, and 12 months was 90.5%, 79.8%, and 64.2%, respectively. Mean retention time on PER treatment was 10.8 months. The 50% responder rate was 58.3% at 12 months and 50.0% at the last visit, and the corresponding seizure freedom rates were 23.2% and 20.5%, respectively; 52.7% of PWE with status epilepticus responded to PER treatment. Overall, 49.9% of PWE reported AEs and the most frequently reported AEs (≥ 5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (15.2%), somnolence (10.6%), irritability (8.4%), and behavioral disorders (5.4%). At 12 months, 17.6% of PWEs had discontinued due to AEs. PERMIT demonstrated that PER is effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat people with focal and/or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1957-1977
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Neurology
Volume269
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 04 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Antiseizure medication
  • Effectiveness
  • Focal epilepsy
  • Generalized epilepsy
  • Observational study
  • Tolerability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this