Abstract
Through the use of an effective simulated annealing algorithm, this paper presents an extensive computational investigation concerning the performance evaluation of non-permutation vs. permutation schedules for the flowline manufacturing cell with sequence dependent setup times. The results show that there are significant improvements made by using non-permutation schedules over permutation schedules regarding completion-time based and due-date based criteria. It is suggested that practitioners could adopt non-permutation schedules to improve their operational efficiency within a reasonable amount of computational effort.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2169-2184 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | International Journal of Production Research |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 01 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Due dates
- Flowshop manufacturing cell
- Makespan
- Non-permutation schedules
- Scheduling
- Sequence dependent family setups
- Simulated annealing algorithm
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Permutation and non-permutation schedules for the flowline manufacturing cell with sequence dependent family setups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver