TY - JOUR
T1 - Poor tumor differentiation is an independent adverse prognostic variable in patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer––Comparison with pathological risk factors according to the NCCN guidelines
AU - Lee, Li Yu
AU - Lin, Chien Yu
AU - Cheng, Nai Ming
AU - Tsai, Chi Ying
AU - Hsueh, Chuen
AU - Fan, Kang Hsing
AU - Wang, Hung Ming
AU - Hsieh, Chia Hsun
AU - Ng, Shu Hang
AU - Yeh, Chih Hua
AU - Lin, Chih Hung
AU - Tsao, Chung Kan
AU - Fang, Tuan Jen
AU - Huang, Shiang Fu
AU - Lee, Li Ang
AU - Kang, Chung Jan
AU - Fang, Ku Hao
AU - Wang, Yu Chien
AU - Lin, Wan Ni
AU - Hsin, Li Jen
AU - Yen, Tzu Chen
AU - Liao, Chun Ta
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Methods: We sought to compare the prognostic impact of tumor differentiation with respect to adverse risk factors (RFs) identified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines––including extranodal extension (ENE), positive/close margins, perineural invasion, lymphatic invasion, and vascular invasion––in patients with locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Results: Between 1996 and 2018, 1179 consecutive patients with first primary pT3–4 OCSCC were included. A three-level grading system was adopted––in which the final classification was assigned according to the most prevalent tumor grade. We identified 382/669/128 patients with well/moderately/poorly differentiated tumors, respectively. Compared with well/moderately differentiated tumors, poorly differentiated OCSCC had a higher prevalence of the following variables: female sex (4%/6%/11%), ENE, (14%/36%/61%), positive margins (0.5%/2%/4%), close margins (10%/14%/22%), perineural invasion (22%/50%/63%), lymphatic invasion (2%/9%/17%), vascular invasion (1%/4%/10%), and adjuvant therapy (64%/80%/87%). The 5-year rates of patients with well/moderately/poorly differentiated OCSCC were as follows: local control (LC, 85%/82%/84%, p = 0.439), neck control (NC, 91%/83%/70%, p < 0.001), distant metastases (DM, 6%/18%/40%, p < 0.001), disease-free survival (DFS, 78%/63%/46%, p < 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS, 85%/71%/49%, p < 0.001), and overall survival (OS, 68%/55%/39%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the following variables as independent prognosticators for 5-year outcomes: ENE (LC/NC/DM/DFS/DSS/OS), poorly differentiated tumors (NC/DM/DFS/DSS/OS), positive margins (LC/DFS), lymphatic invasion (DFS/DSS/OS), perineural invasion (DM), and age ≥65 years (OS). Conclusions: In addition to ENE, poor tumor differentiation was identified as the second most relevant adverse RF for patients with pT3–4 OCSCC. We suggest that the NCCN guidelines should include poor tumor differentiation as an adverse RF to refine and tailor clinical management.
AB - Methods: We sought to compare the prognostic impact of tumor differentiation with respect to adverse risk factors (RFs) identified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines––including extranodal extension (ENE), positive/close margins, perineural invasion, lymphatic invasion, and vascular invasion––in patients with locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Results: Between 1996 and 2018, 1179 consecutive patients with first primary pT3–4 OCSCC were included. A three-level grading system was adopted––in which the final classification was assigned according to the most prevalent tumor grade. We identified 382/669/128 patients with well/moderately/poorly differentiated tumors, respectively. Compared with well/moderately differentiated tumors, poorly differentiated OCSCC had a higher prevalence of the following variables: female sex (4%/6%/11%), ENE, (14%/36%/61%), positive margins (0.5%/2%/4%), close margins (10%/14%/22%), perineural invasion (22%/50%/63%), lymphatic invasion (2%/9%/17%), vascular invasion (1%/4%/10%), and adjuvant therapy (64%/80%/87%). The 5-year rates of patients with well/moderately/poorly differentiated OCSCC were as follows: local control (LC, 85%/82%/84%, p = 0.439), neck control (NC, 91%/83%/70%, p < 0.001), distant metastases (DM, 6%/18%/40%, p < 0.001), disease-free survival (DFS, 78%/63%/46%, p < 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS, 85%/71%/49%, p < 0.001), and overall survival (OS, 68%/55%/39%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the following variables as independent prognosticators for 5-year outcomes: ENE (LC/NC/DM/DFS/DSS/OS), poorly differentiated tumors (NC/DM/DFS/DSS/OS), positive margins (LC/DFS), lymphatic invasion (DFS/DSS/OS), perineural invasion (DM), and age ≥65 years (OS). Conclusions: In addition to ENE, poor tumor differentiation was identified as the second most relevant adverse RF for patients with pT3–4 OCSCC. We suggest that the NCCN guidelines should include poor tumor differentiation as an adverse RF to refine and tailor clinical management.
KW - histopathological risk factors
KW - oral cavity
KW - prognosis
KW - squamous cell carcinoma
KW - tumor differentiation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115015865&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cam4.4195
DO - 10.1002/cam4.4195
M3 - 文章
C2 - 34533269
AN - SCOPUS:85115015865
SN - 2045-7634
VL - 10
SP - 6627
EP - 6641
JO - Cancer Medicine
JF - Cancer Medicine
IS - 19
ER -
