Abstract
Background: The aim of this investigation is to compare the postoperative renal outcomes after on-pump beatingheart versus conventional cardioplegic arrest coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2012, 254 patients who underwent isolated CABG were enrolled. The primary outcome was postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) within 7 days [defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline] and loss of kidney function at 1 year (defined as > 20% loss in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline preoperative creatinine level). Results: Therewas less AKI found for the on-pump beating-heart CABG (30.2% versus 46.3%; p = 0.010) group; with significant less stage I AKI (17.6% versus 29.5%; p = 0.035); a trend of less stage II AKI (4.4% versus 10.5%; p = 0.088) and no significant difference in stage III AKI (8.2% versus 6.3%; p = 0.587). The on-pump beating-heart group also had less patients who have lost their kidney function at 1 year (24.8% versus 41.2%; p = 0.021). Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified conventional arrest CABG is an independent risk factor for postoperative AKI and loss of kidney function at 1 year. Conclusions: On-pump beating-heart CABG has superior short-term and mid-term renal outcomes than conventional cardioplegic arrest CABG.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 542-550 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Acta Cardiologica Sinica |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 09 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017, Republic of China Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Acute kidney injury
- Coronary artery bypass grafting
- Prognosis