Abstract
Background/Aim: We compared the adequacy of five nutrition assessment tools with respect to their predictive value in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) receiving radical surgery. Patients and Methods: Five nutrition assessment tools-Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), malnutritional universal screening tool (MUST), nutritional risk screening, patient generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI)-were assessed preoperatively for stage III GC patients. The correlation between postoperative events and nutritional status was further analyzed. Results: Most of the nutritional tools accurately predicted length of hospital stay and grade 3 or higher surgical complications, while only the GPS correlated with 30-day readmission and surgical complications. The PG-SGA performed the poorest among the five tools and failed to predict any postoperative event. Conclusion: The application of GPS is recommended as a prognostic index for patients with locally advanced GC prior to radical surgery.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2803-2809 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | In Vivo |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 09 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 International Institute of Anticancer Research. All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger -
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Gastric cancer
- Glasgow prognostic score
- Nutritional assessment tool
- Postoperative complication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting postoperative events in patients with gastric cancer: A comparison of five nutrition assessment tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver