Predictive factors for do-not-resuscitate designation among terminally ill cancer patients receiving care from a palliative care consultation service

Chen Yi Kao, Hung Ming Wang, Shu Chuan Tang, Kuan Gen Huang, Tang Her Jaing, Chien Ying Liu, Keng Hao Liu, Wen Chi Shen, Jin Hou Wu, Yu Shin Hung, Hung Chih Hsu, Jen Shi Chen, Chi Ting Liau, Yung Chang Lin, Po Jung Su, Chia Hsun Hsieh, Wen Chi Chou*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context Since the development of palliative care in the 1980s, "do not resuscitate" (DNR) has been promoted worldwide to avoid unnecessary resuscitation in terminally ill cancer patients. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a palliative care consultation service (PCCS) on DNR designation and to identify a subgroup of patients who would potentially benefit from care by the PCCS with respect to DNR designation. Methods In total, 2995 terminally ill cancer patients (with a predicted life expectancy of less than six months by clinician estimate) who received care by the PCCS between January 2006 and December 2010 at a single medical center in Taiwan were selected. Among these, the characteristics of 2020 (67.4%) patients who were not designated as DNR at the beginning of care by the PCCS were retrospectively analyzed to identify variables pertinent to DNR designation. Results A total of 1301 (64%) of 2020 patients were designated as DNR at the end of care by the PCCS. Male gender and primary liver cancer were characteristics more predominantly found among DNR-designated patients who also had worse performance status, higher prevalence of physical distress, and shorter intervals from palliative care referral to death than did patients without DNR designation. On univariate analysis, a higher probability of DNR designation was associated with male gender, duration of care by the PCCS of more than 14 days, patients' prognostic awareness, family's diagnostic and prognostic awareness, and high Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) scores. On multivariate analysis, duration of care by the PCCS, patients' prognostic awareness, family's diagnostic and prognostic awareness, and a high PPI score constituted independent variables predicting DNR-designated patients at the end of care by the PCCS. Conclusion DNR designation was late in terminally ill cancer patients. DNR-designated cancer patient indicators were high PPI scores, patients' prognostic awareness, family's diagnostic and prognostic awareness, and longer durations of care by the PCCS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-282
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 02 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Palliative Prognostic Index
  • Terminal cancer
  • do-not-resuscitate
  • palliative care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive factors for do-not-resuscitate designation among terminally ill cancer patients receiving care from a palliative care consultation service'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this