Predictive Value of Swab Cultures for Cryopreserved Flaps During Delayed Cranioplasties

Mun Chun Yeap, Ching Chang Chen, Chun Ting Chen, Zhuo Hao Liu, Chieh Tsai Wu, Po Chuan Hsieh, Hong Yi Lai, Yu Chi Wang, Ting Wei Chang, Cheng Chi Lee, Yu Tse Liu, Yin Cheng Huang, Kuo Chen Wei, Po Hsun Tu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the predictive value of swab cultures of cryopreserved skull flaps during cranioplasties for surgical site infections (SSIs). Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent delayed cranioplasties with cryopreserved autografts between 2009 and 2017. The results of cultures obtained from swabs and infected surgical sites were assessed. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of swab cultures for SSIs were evaluated. Results: The study included 422 patients categorized into two groups, swab and nonswab, depending on whether swab cultures were implemented during cranioplasties. The overall infection rate was 7.58%. No difference was seen in infection rates between groups. There were 18 false-positive and no true-positive swab culture results. All bacteria between swab cultures and SSI cultures were discordant. Meanwhile, there were 19 false-negative swab cultures. The results showed high specificity but low sensitivity for swab cultures to predict SSI occurrence and the pathogens. Conclusions: Owing to low accuracy and sensitivity, swab cultures of cryopreserved autografts should not be routinely performed during delayed cranioplasties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e173-e178
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume157
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Cranioplasty
  • Cryopreserved flaps
  • Surgical site infection
  • Swab culture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive Value of Swab Cultures for Cryopreserved Flaps During Delayed Cranioplasties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this