Predictors for temporary stomas non-closure among non-metastatic rectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection: a retrospective analysis

Chia Chien Hsu, Wen Sy Tsai, Tzong Yun Tsai, Jeng Fu You, Chien Yuh Yeh, Pao Shiu Hsieh, Reiping Tang, Shu Huan Huang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary treatment for non-metastatic rectal cancer is curative resection. However, sphincter-preserving surgery may lead to complications. This study aims to develop a predictive model for stoma non-closure in rectal cancer patients who underwent curative-intent low anterior resection.

METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal cancer between January 2005 and December 2017, who underwent low anterior resection, were retrospectively included in the Chang Gung Memorial Foundation Institutional Review Board. A comprehensive evaluation and analysis of potential risk factors linked to stoma non-closure were performed.

RESULTS: Out of 956 patients with temporary stomas, 10.3% (n = 103) experienced non-closure primarily due to cancer recurrence and anastomosis-related issues. Through multivariate analysis, several preoperative risk factors significantly associated with stoma non-closure were identified, including advanced age, anastomotic leakage, positive nodal status, high preoperative CEA levels, lower rectal cancer presence, margin involvement, and an eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73m2. A risk assessment model achieved an AUC of 0.724, with a cutoff of 2.5, 84.5% sensitivity, and 51.4% specificity. Importantly, the non-closure rate could rise to 16.6% when more than two risk factors were present, starkly contrasting the 3.7% non-closure rate observed in cases with a risk score of 2 or below (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Prognostic risk factors associated with the non-closure of a temporary stoma include advanced age, symptomatic anastomotic leakage, nodal status, high CEA levels, margin involvement, and an eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73m2. Hence, it is crucial for surgeons to evaluate these factors and provide patients with a comprehensive prognosis before undergoing surgical intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Article number124
Pages (from-to)124
JournalWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 07 05 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© 2024. The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Rectal Neoplasms/surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Female
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Surgical Stomas/adverse effects
  • Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Risk Factors
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Anastomotic Leak/etiology
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
  • Postoperative Complications/etiology
  • Adult
  • Proctectomy/methods
  • Aged, 80 and over

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors for temporary stomas non-closure among non-metastatic rectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection: a retrospective analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this