Preliminary Asian experience of using perampanel in clinical practice

Hsing I. Chiang, Siew Na Lim, Hsiang Yao Hsieh, Mei Yun Cheng, Chun Wei Chang, Wei En Johnny Tseng, Han Tao Li, Chin Yin Lin, Tony Wu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: To analyze the efficacy and safety of perampanel over a 3-month period in a sample of Asian people with epilepsy. Methods: The efficacy and safety of perampanel as an adjunctive therapy for patients with epilepsy were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were categorized according to seizure type, concomitant antiepileptic drug usage, and perampanel dosage. Results: A total of 210 patients were included in the study and 131 patients completed 3 months of perampanel treatment. The average dosage of perampanel was 5.31 mg/day, and the 50% responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction) in all patients was 45.8%, with a 27.5% seizure-free rate. For focal seizures, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, and primary generalized seizures, the 50% responder rates were respectively 29.4%, 49.5%, and 36.4%. In total, 39.5% of patients experienced adverse events within 3 months of observation period, and the rate of drug withdrawal due to adverse events was 8.6%. Dizziness, ataxia, irritability/aggression were the most common adverse events. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of perampanel in a real-world setting with Asian patients is comparable to that in clinical trials that have included fewer Asian patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-354
Number of pages8
JournalBiomedical Journal
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Chang Gung University

Keywords

  • Adverse event
  • Efficacy
  • Perampanel
  • Safety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preliminary Asian experience of using perampanel in clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this