Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multivariate analysis

  • Simon Guo Jeng Tang*
  • , Fang Jen Lin
  • , Ming Shen Chen
  • , Chuang Chi Liaw
  • , Wai Man Leung
  • , Ji Hong Hong
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

Between 1979 and 1985, 561 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were reviewed to determine prognostic factors that may influence survival. Sex (p = 0.294) and histopathology (p = 0.677) had no correlation to the acturial survival, whereas the site of cervical metastasis (p = 0.001) and the radiation doses to the nasopharynx and regional lymph nodes (p = 0.03) were both significant when one used univariate analyses. Cox's multivariate regression model revealed that the presence rather than the site of distant metastases was the single most important independent factor influencing the treatment outcome (p < 0.0001). The addition of chemotherapy, on the other hand, did not show a survival benefit even when one took available confounding factors into account. There are, however, survival advantages associated with: (a) young age (≤40 years), (b) asymptomatic status, (c) Stage I or II lesions, and (d) biopsy via nasopharynx instead of neck nodes. These favorable prognostic factors may be used for therapeutic guidance and end-result reporting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1143-1149
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 1990
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  • Prognostic factors
  • Radiotherapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multivariate analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this