Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prognostic implications of single antiplatelet therapy in individuals developing diabetic foot disease with concurrent peripheral arterial disease

  • Cheng Wei Lin
  • , Yu Yao Huang
  • , Chia Hung Lin
  • , Chung Huei Huang
  • , Shih Yuan Hung
  • , I. Wen Chen
  • , Yi Chia Chen
  • , Pi Hua Liu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Chang Gung University
  • National Tsing Hua University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

Abstract

Background: Antiplatelet therapy is recommended for secondary prevention in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), particularly after a diabetic foot event. Nevertheless, the relative effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for long-term outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: Using the Taiwan Health and Welfare Data Center database, we identified 2,597 adults with type 2 diabetes who experienced their first diabetic foot disease (DFD) event with concurrent PAD between 2016 and 2019 and subsequently received a single antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention after stabilization. Outcomes included major lower extremity amputation (LEA), major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards and Fine–Gray competing risk models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution HRs (sHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Baseline characteristics indicated higher comorbidity burdens in the clopidogrel and cilostazol groups. After adjustment, the risks of LEA and MACE did not differ significantly among treatment groups. Compared with aspirin, cilostazol was associated with a higher risk of MALE (sHR 1.45 [95% CI 1.15–1.84]), whereas clopidogrel showed a nonsignificant trend (sHR 1.31 [95% CI 0.99–1.72]). Both cilostazol (HR 1.21 [95% CI 1.06–1.39]) and clopidogrel (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.07–1.46]) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed no significant mortality differences among dialysis patients, and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusions: Among diabetic patients with PAD and a history of a foot event, aspirin was associated with comparable limb and cardiovascular outcomes, and potentially favorable survival, compared with clopidogrel or cilostazol. These observational findings suggest aspirin is a practical antiplatelet option for secondary prevention in this high-risk population, though further precise trials are needed to verify.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2653300
Pages (from-to)2653300
JournalAnnals of Medicine
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • antiplatelet therapy
  • Diabetic foot disease
  • lower-extremity amputation
  • major adverse cardiovascular event
  • major adverse limb event
  • peripheral arterial disease
  • survival
  • Prognosis
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Secondary Prevention/methods
  • Female
  • Cilostazol/therapeutic use
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Aspirin/therapeutic use
  • Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications
  • Taiwan/epidemiology
  • Clopidogrel/therapeutic use
  • Diabetic Foot/epidemiology
  • Aged

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic implications of single antiplatelet therapy in individuals developing diabetic foot disease with concurrent peripheral arterial disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this