TY - JOUR
T1 - Promising results of stent graft placement for cephalic arch stenosis after repeated failure of angioplasty in patients on hemodialysis
AU - Feng, Pin Chao
AU - Lee, Chun Hui
AU - Hsieh, Hung Chang
AU - Ko, Po Jen
AU - Yu, Sheng Yueh
AU - Lin, Yu Sheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Objective: Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) causes repeated dysfunction and failure of arteriovenous access. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is the standard initial treatment for CAS, but its outcome is unsatisfactory. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of stent graft placement for CAS in patients on hemodialysis. Methods: A retrospective chart review from a tertiary medical center was performed in patients receiving stent graft placement for CAS between January 2012 and 2016. Patency was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Twenty-one patients received stent graft placement for CAS. Technical and clinical success rates were 100%. Primary target lesion patency was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86%–100%), 76% (95% CI, 58%–94%), and 43% (95% CI, 22%–64%) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. No significant difference in patency was observed between the arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft groups. Assisted primary patency was 95% (95% CI, 86%–100%), 71% (95% CI, 52%–91%), and 57% (95% CI, 36%–78%) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Secondary patency was 100% at 3, 6, and 12 months. Conclusions: After repeated failed angioplasty for cephalic arch stenosis, patients on hemodialysis who receive stent graft placement have effective and durable outcomes.
AB - Objective: Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) causes repeated dysfunction and failure of arteriovenous access. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is the standard initial treatment for CAS, but its outcome is unsatisfactory. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of stent graft placement for CAS in patients on hemodialysis. Methods: A retrospective chart review from a tertiary medical center was performed in patients receiving stent graft placement for CAS between January 2012 and 2016. Patency was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Twenty-one patients received stent graft placement for CAS. Technical and clinical success rates were 100%. Primary target lesion patency was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86%–100%), 76% (95% CI, 58%–94%), and 43% (95% CI, 22%–64%) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. No significant difference in patency was observed between the arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft groups. Assisted primary patency was 95% (95% CI, 86%–100%), 71% (95% CI, 52%–91%), and 57% (95% CI, 36%–78%) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Secondary patency was 100% at 3, 6, and 12 months. Conclusions: After repeated failed angioplasty for cephalic arch stenosis, patients on hemodialysis who receive stent graft placement have effective and durable outcomes.
KW - Cephalic arch
KW - angioplasty
KW - arteriovenous access
KW - hemodialysis
KW - lesion patency
KW - stent graft
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086336455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0300060520920419
DO - 10.1177/0300060520920419
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85086336455
SN - 0300-0605
VL - 48
JO - Journal of International Medical Research
JF - Journal of International Medical Research
IS - 6
ER -