TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of life for head and neck cancer patients treated by combined modality therapy
T2 - The therapeutic benefit of technological advances in radiotherapy
AU - Huang, Tai Lin
AU - Tsai, Wen Ling
AU - Chien, Chih Yen
AU - Lee, Tsair Fwu
AU - Fang, Fu Min
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate quality of life (QoL) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated by combined modality therapy, with a focus on the therapeutic benefits of QoL that result from technological advances in radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of QoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires was performed for 307 HNSCC survivors. One hundred and thirty-five patients were treated by two-dimensional RT (2DRT), 90 by three-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT), and 82 by intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). The effect size between groups was calculated using Cohen's D coefficient. Results: Those who had a higher annual family income or were treated by more advanced RT techniques had better QoL outcomes. Compared with 2DRT, the impact of 3DCRT was small (Cohen's D: 0.02-0.40) on all QoL scales. For IMRT, the impact was small on most scales and moderate (Cohen's D: 0.55-0.60) on opening mouth, dry mouth, and sticky saliva. Compared with 3DCRT, the impact of IMRT was small (Cohen's D: 0.03-0.29) on all scales. Conclusion: Advances in RT provided a positive effect on QoL outcome, especially on swallowing-related QoL scales, for patients with HNSCC treated by combined modality therapy.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate quality of life (QoL) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated by combined modality therapy, with a focus on the therapeutic benefits of QoL that result from technological advances in radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of QoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires was performed for 307 HNSCC survivors. One hundred and thirty-five patients were treated by two-dimensional RT (2DRT), 90 by three-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT), and 82 by intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). The effect size between groups was calculated using Cohen's D coefficient. Results: Those who had a higher annual family income or were treated by more advanced RT techniques had better QoL outcomes. Compared with 2DRT, the impact of 3DCRT was small (Cohen's D: 0.02-0.40) on all QoL scales. For IMRT, the impact was small on most scales and moderate (Cohen's D: 0.55-0.60) on opening mouth, dry mouth, and sticky saliva. Compared with 3DCRT, the impact of IMRT was small (Cohen's D: 0.03-0.29) on all scales. Conclusion: Advances in RT provided a positive effect on QoL outcome, especially on swallowing-related QoL scales, for patients with HNSCC treated by combined modality therapy.
KW - EORTC QLQ-C30
KW - EORTC QLQ-H&N35
KW - Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
KW - Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
KW - Quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78349310126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11136-010-9688-3
DO - 10.1007/s11136-010-9688-3
M3 - 文章
C2 - 20544291
AN - SCOPUS:78349310126
SN - 0962-9343
VL - 19
SP - 1243
EP - 1254
JO - Quality of Life Research
JF - Quality of Life Research
IS - 9
ER -