Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy

  • Nasser Hanna*
  • , Frances A. Shepherd
  • , Frank V. Fossella
  • , Jose R. Pereira
  • , Filippo Demarinis
  • , Joachim Von Pawel
  • , Ulrich Gatzemeier
  • , Thomas Chang Yao Tsao
  • , Miklos Pless
  • , Thomas Muller
  • , Hong Liang Lim
  • , Christopher Desch
  • , Klara Szondy
  • , Radj Gervais
  • , Shaharyar
  • , Christian Manegold
  • , Sofia Paul
  • , Paolo Paoletti
  • , Lawrence Einhorn
  • , Paul A. Bunn
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • Unknown

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

2439 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1 with vitamin B 12, folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival. Results: Five hundred seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Overall response rates were 9.1% and 8.8% (analysis of variance P = .105) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months (P = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7%. Patients receiving docetaxel were more likely to have grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40.2% v 5.3%; P < .001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% v 1.9%; P < .001), neutropenia with infections (3.3% v 0.0%; P = .004), hospitalizations for neutropenic fever (13.4% v 1.5%; P < .001), hospitalizations due to other drug related adverse events (10.5% v 6.4%; P = .092), use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (19.2% v 2.6%, P < .001) and all grade alopecia (37.7% v 6.4%; P < .001) compared with patients receiving pemetrexed. Conclusion: Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-line NSCLC when available.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1589-1597
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this