Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of S-1 Monotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Management: Insights From a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

  • I. Lin Tsai
  • , Chien Yu Lin
  • , Po Lan Su
  • , Chien Chung Lin
  • , John Wen Cheng Chang
  • , Chen Yang Huang
  • , Yueh Fu Fang
  • , Ching Fu Chang
  • , Chih Hsi Scott Kuo
  • , Ping Chih Hsu
  • , Cheng Ta Yang
  • , Chiao En Wu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Chang Gung University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: S-1, an oral chemotherapy combining tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil, has shown efficacy comparable with docetaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical trials. However, its real-world effectiveness and safety remain underexplored.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 2 tertiary referral centers: National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH) from July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2023 (last follow-up in October 31, 2023) and Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) from February 1, 2020 to January 31, 2023 (last follow-up in August 31, 2023). The study included 132 NSCLC patients receiving S-1 monotherapy (77 from CGMH and 55 from NCKUH). After excluding 31 patients with less than 2 weeks of treatment, 101 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) was 7.9%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 44%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.6 and 6.0 months, respectively. First-line or second-line S-1 therapy significantly improved DCR (61.1% vs 33.8%, P  = .008) and PFS (4.2 vs 2.3 months, P  < .001) compared with third-line or later use. Cox regression analysis confirmed earlier-line S-1 treatment (⩽ 2) as an independent predictor for PFS (hazard ratio: 2.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-3.51, P  = .014). Severe adverse events (grade ⩾ 3) occurred in 7.9% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS: S-1 monotherapy demonstrated comparable effectiveness and manageable toxicity in real-world settings, with significantly better outcomes when used as first-line or second-line treatment in NSCLC.

Original languageEnglish
Article number11795549251348367
Pages (from-to)11795549251348367
JournalClinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
Volume19
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 01 2025

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2025.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • S-1 monotherapy
  • efficacy and safety
  • real-world study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-World Efficacy and Safety of S-1 Monotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Management: Insights From a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this