Abstract
Patients with advanced head and neck cancers require reconstruction with a double free flap, but in some situations, it is extremely difficult to attain the ideal set of recipient vessels for these patients. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 had one recipient vessel; group 2 had two recipient vessels. Fifty-five patients were enrolled between 2001 and 2005. Double flaps, including a fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap and an anterolateral thigh flap, were used for the reconstruction. In group 1, the second flap was anastomosed at the distal runoff of the fibular flap. Group 1 contained 39 patients and group 2 had 16 patients. No significant differences in the success rate, operating time, days of hospitalization, or complication rate were noted between groups 1 and 2. Thus using one recipient vessel is our first choice for double free-flap reconstruction for head and neck defects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 191-196 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 04 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Double free-flap reconstruction
- Head and neck cancer
- Single recipient vessel
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reconstruction of Head and Neck Cancer with Double Flaps: Comparison of Single and Double Recipient Vessels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver