Response to Wilson’s note on ‘Influences of resource limitations and transmission costs on epidemic simulations and critical thresholds in scale-free networks’

Yu Shiuan Tsai, Chuen Tsai Sun, Chung Yuan Huang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

Abstract

James R. Wilson points out what he describes as flaws in our proof in ‘Influences of Resource Limitations and Transmission Costs on Epidemic Simulations and Critical Thresholds in Scale-free Networks’ (Simulation 85(3): 205—219) and offers an alternative steady-state behavior derivation based on our epidemic simulation model. In this response we will explain our definitions for the terms used in our paper and the derivation process for our analysis, then compare and contrast our mathematical model with that proposed by Wilson. We suggest that more compartmental models can be used to support our argument that increasing transmission costs or decreasing individual resources increases the critical threshold of a contagion event in a scale-free network.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-270
Number of pages4
JournalSimulation
Volume87
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 03 2011

Keywords

  • complex networks
  • critical thresholds
  • effective spreading rate
  • heterogeneous networks
  • resource limitations
  • transmission costs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Wilson’s note on ‘Influences of resource limitations and transmission costs on epidemic simulations and critical thresholds in scale-free networks’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this