Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Revisiting the valuation of deposit insurance

  • Chuang Chang Chang
  • , San Lin Chung
  • , Ruey Jenn Ho*
  • , Yu Jen Hsiao
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • National Central University
  • Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research
  • National Taiwan University
  • Providence University Taiwan
  • Taipei Medical University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study proposes a framework for pricing deposit insurance that evaluates the effect of depositor preference laws and the issuance of contingent capital bonds. Four main findings emerge from this study. First, traditional option pricing models of deposit insurance overestimate insurance premiums. Second, only large issuances of contingent capital bonds decrease deposit insurance premiums under depositor preference. Third, the issuance of contingent capital bonds can partially offset banks' excessive risk-taking caused by regulatory forbearance. Finally, although large banks have implied too-big-to-fail risks, the deposit insurer's costs from large banks are not nearly as high as reported in previous studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-103
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Futures Markets
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • contingent capital bonds
  • deposit insurance
  • depositor preference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the valuation of deposit insurance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this