Risk comparison of osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporotic patients treated with bisphosphonates vs. denosumab: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

Fang Chun Liu, Kwing Chi Luk, Yung Chih Chen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this multi-institutional retrospective cohort study, we compared the long-term risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw following the use of denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients. After 2-year use, the likelihood of osteonecrosis of the jaw is lower with denosumab compared to bisphosphonates, and the difference increases with time.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) between osteoporotic patients treated with bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab.

METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study included patients aged > 40 years with osteoporosis between January 2010 and December 2018. Patients who met the eligibility criteria were divided into BPs and denosumab groups by propensity score matching (PSM). The risk of ONJ of denosumab vs. BPs was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model and was described by the cumulative incidence rate using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS: A total of 84,102 patients with osteoporosis were enrolled, among whom, 8962 were eligible for inclusion based on their first-line drug use (denosumab, n = 3,823; BPs, n = 5,139). Following PCM matching (1:1), the BPs and denosumab groups included 3665 patients each. The incidence density of ONJ in the denosumab and BPs matching groups was 1.47 vs. 2.49 events (per 1000 person-years), respectively. The hazard ratio of ONJ in the denosumab vs. BPs group was estimated as 0.581 (95% confidence interval: 0.33-1.04, p = 0.07). The cumulative incidence rates of ONJ in both groups were similar for the first and second years of drug use (p = 0.062), but significantly different from the third year onwards (p = 0.022). The severity of ONJ was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: In osteoporotic patients, after 2 years of use, the likelihood of ONJ being induced by denosumab is lower than that of BPs, and the difference increases with time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1729-1737
Number of pages9
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume34
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© 2023. The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Bisphosphonates
  • Bone necrosis of jaw
  • Denosumab
  • Osteoporosis
  • Humans
  • Risk Factors
  • Diphosphonates/adverse effects
  • Osteonecrosis/chemically induced
  • Taiwan/epidemiology
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects
  • Osteoporosis/complications
  • Denosumab/adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk comparison of osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporotic patients treated with bisphosphonates vs. denosumab: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study in Taiwan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this