TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in pT1 and pT2 rectal cancer
T2 - A single-institute experience in 943 patients and literature review
AU - Chang, Hao Cheng
AU - Huang, Shih Chiang
AU - Chen, Jinn Shiun
AU - Tang, Reiping
AU - Changchien, Chung Rong
AU - Chiang, Jy Ming
AU - Yeh, Chien Yuh
AU - Hsieh, Pao Shiu
AU - Tsai, Wen Sy
AU - Hung, Hsin Yuan
AU - You, Jeng Fu
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - Background: Local excision has become an alternative for radical resection in rectal cancer for selected patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinicopathologic factors determining lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with T1-2 rectal cancer. Methods: Between January 1995 and December 2009, a total of 943 patients with pT1 or pT2 rectal adenocarcinoma received radical resection at a single institution. Clinicopathologic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses to identify risk factors for LNM. Results: A total of 943 patients (544 men and 399 women) treated for T1-2 rectal cancer were included in this study. LNM was found in 188 patients (19.9%). In multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI; P < 0.001, hazard ratio 11.472), poor differentiation (PD; P = 0.007, hazard ratio 3.218), and depth of invasion (presence of pT2; P = 0.032, hazard ratio 1.694) were significantly related to nodal involvement. The incidence for LNM lesions in the presence of LVI, PD, and pT2 was 68.8, 50.0, and 23.1%, respectively, while that for pT1 carcinomas with no LVI or PD was 7.5%. Conclusions: LVI, PD, and pT2 are independent risk factors predicting LNM in pT1-2 rectal carcinoma.
AB - Background: Local excision has become an alternative for radical resection in rectal cancer for selected patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinicopathologic factors determining lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with T1-2 rectal cancer. Methods: Between January 1995 and December 2009, a total of 943 patients with pT1 or pT2 rectal adenocarcinoma received radical resection at a single institution. Clinicopathologic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses to identify risk factors for LNM. Results: A total of 943 patients (544 men and 399 women) treated for T1-2 rectal cancer were included in this study. LNM was found in 188 patients (19.9%). In multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI; P < 0.001, hazard ratio 11.472), poor differentiation (PD; P = 0.007, hazard ratio 3.218), and depth of invasion (presence of pT2; P = 0.032, hazard ratio 1.694) were significantly related to nodal involvement. The incidence for LNM lesions in the presence of LVI, PD, and pT2 was 68.8, 50.0, and 23.1%, respectively, while that for pT1 carcinomas with no LVI or PD was 7.5%. Conclusions: LVI, PD, and pT2 are independent risk factors predicting LNM in pT1-2 rectal carcinoma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864973825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-012-2303-9
DO - 10.1245/s10434-012-2303-9
M3 - 文献综述
C2 - 22396007
AN - SCOPUS:84864973825
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 19
SP - 2477
EP - 2484
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 8
ER -