Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in pT1 and pT2 rectal cancer: A single-institute experience in 943 patients and literature review

Hao Cheng Chang*, Shih Chiang Huang, Jinn Shiun Chen, Reiping Tang, Chung Rong Changchien, Jy Ming Chiang, Chien Yuh Yeh, Pao Shiu Hsieh, Wen Sy Tsai, Hsin Yuan Hung, Jeng Fu You

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Local excision has become an alternative for radical resection in rectal cancer for selected patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinicopathologic factors determining lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with T1-2 rectal cancer. Methods: Between January 1995 and December 2009, a total of 943 patients with pT1 or pT2 rectal adenocarcinoma received radical resection at a single institution. Clinicopathologic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses to identify risk factors for LNM. Results: A total of 943 patients (544 men and 399 women) treated for T1-2 rectal cancer were included in this study. LNM was found in 188 patients (19.9%). In multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI; P < 0.001, hazard ratio 11.472), poor differentiation (PD; P = 0.007, hazard ratio 3.218), and depth of invasion (presence of pT2; P = 0.032, hazard ratio 1.694) were significantly related to nodal involvement. The incidence for LNM lesions in the presence of LVI, PD, and pT2 was 68.8, 50.0, and 23.1%, respectively, while that for pT1 carcinomas with no LVI or PD was 7.5%. Conclusions: LVI, PD, and pT2 are independent risk factors predicting LNM in pT1-2 rectal carcinoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2477-2484
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume19
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 08 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in pT1 and pT2 rectal cancer: A single-institute experience in 943 patients and literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this