TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and efficacy of topical anesthesia combined with a lower concentration of intracameral lidocaine in phacoemulsification. Paired human eye study
AU - Chuang, Lan Hsin
AU - Yeung, Ling
AU - Ku, Wan Chen
AU - Yang, Ko Jen
AU - Lai, Chi Chun
PY - 2007/2
Y1 - 2007/2
N2 - Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification under a topical anesthesia combined with intracameral lidocaine 0.5%. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, China. Methods: A prospective randomized double-blind study was designed in which patients had phacoemulsification performed under topical anesthesia (4 drops of nonpreserved lidocaine 2%) with 0.15 mL intracameral placebo (balanced salt solution) in 1 eye (Group 1) and topical anesthesia with intracameral nonpreserved lidocaine 0.5% in the other eye (Group 2). Endothelial changes, including cell density, coefficient variation of cell size, and percentage of hexagonal cells, were measured by noncontact specular microscopy. Preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuity was also documented. The degree of pain throughout surgery was ranked on a 10-point visual analog pain scale. Results: Thirty-three patients were recruited. There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative mean endothelial parameters between the 2 groups. Furthermore, mean endothelial cell loss was similar. Mild or no pain (score 0 to 1) was reported by 48.5% in Group 1 and 90.9% in Group 2. Patients reported less pain with combined topical and intracameral lidocaine anesthesia (P = .001, Mann-Whitney test). Vision was significantly improved in both groups. However, 1 patient in Group A developed vitreous loss as a result of involuntary eye movement. Conclusion: Combining topical anesthesia with intracameral lidocaine 2% anesthesia was safe and effective in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.
AB - Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification under a topical anesthesia combined with intracameral lidocaine 0.5%. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, China. Methods: A prospective randomized double-blind study was designed in which patients had phacoemulsification performed under topical anesthesia (4 drops of nonpreserved lidocaine 2%) with 0.15 mL intracameral placebo (balanced salt solution) in 1 eye (Group 1) and topical anesthesia with intracameral nonpreserved lidocaine 0.5% in the other eye (Group 2). Endothelial changes, including cell density, coefficient variation of cell size, and percentage of hexagonal cells, were measured by noncontact specular microscopy. Preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuity was also documented. The degree of pain throughout surgery was ranked on a 10-point visual analog pain scale. Results: Thirty-three patients were recruited. There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative mean endothelial parameters between the 2 groups. Furthermore, mean endothelial cell loss was similar. Mild or no pain (score 0 to 1) was reported by 48.5% in Group 1 and 90.9% in Group 2. Patients reported less pain with combined topical and intracameral lidocaine anesthesia (P = .001, Mann-Whitney test). Vision was significantly improved in both groups. However, 1 patient in Group A developed vitreous loss as a result of involuntary eye movement. Conclusion: Combining topical anesthesia with intracameral lidocaine 2% anesthesia was safe and effective in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846693066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.037
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.037
M3 - 文章
C2 - 17276272
AN - SCOPUS:33846693066
SN - 0886-3350
VL - 33
SP - 293
EP - 296
JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
IS - 2
ER -