Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions induced by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies

  • Chun Bing Chen
  • , Ming Ying Wu
  • , Chau Yee Ng
  • , Chun Wei Lu
  • , Jennifer Wu
  • , Pei Han Kao
  • , Chan-Keng Yang
  • , Meng Ting Peng
  • , Chen Yang Huang
  • , Wen Cheng Chang
  • , Rosaline Chung Yee Hui
  • , Chih Hsun Yang
  • , Shun Fa Yang*
  • , Wen Hung Chung
  • , Shih Chi Su
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Chang Gung University
  • Chung Shan Medical University
  • Xiamen Chang Gung Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

143 Scopus citations

Abstract

With the increasing use of targeted anticancer drugs and immunotherapies, there have been a substantial number of reports concerning life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Although the potential risks and characteristics for targeted anticancer agent-and immunotherapy-induced SCAR were not well understood, these serious adverse reactions usually result in morbidity and sequela. As a treatment guideline for this devastating condition is still unavailable, prompt withdrawal of causative drugs is believed to be a priority of patient management. In this review, we outline distinct types of SCARs caused by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies. Also, we discuss the clinical course, latency, concomitant medication, tolerability of rechallenge or alternatives, tumor response, and mortality associated with these devastating conditions. Imatinib, vemurafenib, and rituximab were the top three offending medications that most commonly caused SJS/TEN, while EGFR inhibitors were the group of drugs that most frequently induced SJS/TEN. For drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, imatinib was also the most common offending drug. Additionally, we delineated 10 SCAR cases related to innovative immunotherapies, including PD1 and CTLA4 inhibitors. There was a wide range of latency periods: 5.5–91 days (median). Only eight of 16 reported patients with SCAR showed clinical responses. Targeted anticancer drugs and immunotherapies can lead to lethal SCAR (14 deceased patients were identified as suffering from SJS/TEN). The mortality rate of TEN was high: up to 52.4%. The information compiled herein will serve as a solid foundation to formulate ideas for early recognition of SCAR and to discontinue offending drugs for better management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1259-1273
Number of pages15
JournalCancer Management and Research
Volume10
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 05 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Chen et al.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis
  • Drug rash
  • Eosinophilia
  • Immunotherapy
  • Johnson syndrome
  • Stevens
  • Targeted therapy
  • Toxic epidermal necrolysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Severe cutaneous adverse reactions induced by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this